Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238491›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

Design consideration on integration of mechanical intravascular ultrasound and electromagnetic tracking sensor for intravascular reconstruction.

Wenran Cai, Kazuaki Hara, Naoki Tomii, Etsuko Kobayashi, Takashi Ohya, Ichiro Sakuma

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenran CaiGraduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. cai@bmpe.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4676-4383
Kazuaki HaraGraduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7291-6825
Naoki TomiiGraduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-0940
Etsuko KobayashiGraduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1794-0173
Takashi OhyaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0094-2722
Ichiro SakumaGraduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4919-9466
The University of Tokyo · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 20H04553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConsidering vessel deformation, endovascular navigation requires intraoperative geometric information. Mechanical intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with an electromagnetic (EM) sensor can be used to reconstruct blood vessels with thin diameter. However, the integration design should be evaluated based on the factors affecting the reconstruction error.

methodsThe interference between the mechanical IVUS and EM sensor was measured in different relative positions. Two designs of the integrated catheter were evaluated by measuring the reconstruction errors using a rigid vascular phantom.

resultsWhen the distance from the EM sensor to the field generator was 75 mm, the interference from mechanical IVUS to an EM sensor was negligible, with position and rotation errors less than 0.1 mm and 0.6°, respectively. The reconstructed vessel model for proximal IVUS transducer had a smooth surface but an inaccurate shape at large curvature of the vascular phantom. When the distance to the field generator was 175 mm, the error increased significantly.

conclusionPlacing the IVUS transducer on the proximal side of the EM sensor is superior in terms of interference reduction but inferior in terms of mechanical stability compared to a distal transducer. The distal side is preferred due to better mechanical stability during catheter manipulation at larger curvature. With this configuration, surface reconstruction errors less than 1.7 mm (with RMS 0.57 mm) were achieved when the distance to the field generator was less than 175 mm.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic PhenomenaEquipment DesignPhantoms, ImagingUltrasonography, InterventionalHumansTransducers3D intravascular reconstructionElectromagnetic (EM) sensorEndovascular navigationIntravascular ultrasound (IVUS)

Identifiers

PMID38238491
PMCPMC11585504
OpenAlexW4390971388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.