Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238433›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2024

Predicting Radiotherapy Patient Outcomes with Real-Time Clinical Data Using Mathematical Modelling.

Alexander P Browning, Thomas D Lewin, Ruth E Baker, Philip K Maini, Eduardo G Moros, Jimmy Caudell, Helen M Byrne, Heiko Enderling

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Mechanistic Model of Brain Necrosis Progression Based on Vascular Heterogeneity.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander P Browning *Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. browning@maths.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8753-1538
Thomas D Lewin *Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ruth E BakerMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Philip K MainiMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Eduardo G MorosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA.
Jimmy CaudellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA.
Helen M Byrne *Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Heiko Enderling *Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA. HEnderling@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/G037280/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal tumour volume data from head-and-neck cancer patients show that tumours of comparable pre-treatment size and stage may respond very differently to the same radiotherapy fractionation protocol. Mathematical models are often proposed to predict treatment outcome in this context, and have the potential to guide clinical decision-making and inform personalised fractionation protocols. Hindering effective use of models in this context is the sparsity of clinical measurements juxtaposed with the model complexity required to produce the full range of possible patient responses. In this work, we present a compartment model of tumour volume and tumour composition, which, despite relative simplicity, is capable of producing a wide range of patient responses. We then develop novel statistical methodology and leverage a cohort of existing clinical data to produce a predictive model of both tumour volume progression and the associated level of uncertainty that evolves throughout a patient's course of treatment. To capture inter-patient variability, all model parameters are patient specific, with a bootstrap particle filter-like Bayesian approach developed to model a set of training data as prior knowledge. We validate our approach against a subset of unseen data, and demonstrate both the predictive ability of our trained model and its limitations.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeoplasmsBayes TheoremHumansMathematical ConceptsModels, TheoreticalHead-and-neck cancerHeterogeneityPatient variabilityPredictive modelRadiotherapyUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID38238433
PMCPMC10796515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.