ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2024
Predicting Radiotherapy Patient Outcomes with Real-Time Clinical Data Using Mathematical Modelling.
Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Mechanistic Model of Brain Necrosis Progression Based on Vascular Heterogeneity.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Pattern Formation as a Resilience Mechanism in Cancer Immunotherapy.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Predicting and monitoring response to head and neck cancer radiotherapy using multimodality imaging and radiobiological digital twin simulations.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- The Evolution of Systems Biology and Systems Medicine: From Mechanistic Models to Uncertainty Quantification.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Article
- Multi-modality imaging parameters that predict rapid tumor regression in head and neck radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Radiobiological Modeling with Monte Carlo Tools - Simulating Cellular Responses to Ionizing Radiation.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Longitudinal tumour volume data from head-and-neck cancer patients show that tumours of comparable pre-treatment size and stage may respond very differently to the same radiotherapy fractionation protocol. Mathematical models are often proposed to predict treatment outcome in this context, and have the potential to guide clinical decision-making and inform personalised fractionation protocols. Hindering effective use of models in this context is the sparsity of clinical measurements juxtaposed with the model complexity required to produce the full range of possible patient responses. In this work, we present a compartment model of tumour volume and tumour composition, which, despite relative simplicity, is capable of producing a wide range of patient responses. We then develop novel statistical methodology and leverage a cohort of existing clinical data to produce a predictive model of both tumour volume progression and the associated level of uncertainty that evolves throughout a patient's course of treatment. To capture inter-patient variability, all model parameters are patient specific, with a bootstrap particle filter-like Bayesian approach developed to model a set of training data as prior knowledge. We validate our approach against a subset of unseen data, and demonstrate both the predictive ability of our trained model and its limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.