Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238384›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2024

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of pharmaceutical interventions used to manage chronic pain.

Ashish Shetty, Gayathri Delanerolle, Heitor Cavalini, Chunli Deng, Xiaojie Yang, Amy Boyd, Tacson Fernandez, Peter Phiri, Arun Bhaskar, Jian Qing Shi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Music-based interventions for chronic pain management.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashish Shetty *University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. ashish.shetty@nhs.net.
Gayathri Delanerolle *Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Heitor Cavalini *Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO40 2RZ, UK.
Chunli Deng *Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Xiaojie YangSchool of Statistics and Mathematics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, China.
Amy BoydUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tacson FernandezUniversity College London, 235, Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Peter PhiriSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO40 2RZ, UK.
Arun BhaskarImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jian Qing ShiSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO40 2RZ, UK.
University of Oxford · GBYunnan University of Finance And Economics · CNCleveland Clinic London · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouthern University of Science and Technology · CNUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated 1.5 billion of the global population suffer from chronic pain with prevalence increasing with demographics including age. It is suggested long-term exposure to chronic could cause further health challenges reducing people's quality of life. Therefore, it is imperative to use effective treatment options. We explored the current pharmaceutical treatments available for chronic pain management to better understand drug efficacy and pain reduction. A systematic methodology was developed and published in PROSPERO (CRD42021235384). Keywords of opioids, acute pain, pain management, chronic pain, opiods, NSAIDs, and analgesics were used across PubMed, Science direct, ProQuest, Web of science, Ovid Psych INFO, PROSPERO, EBSCOhost, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and EMBASE. All randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs), epidemiology and mixed-methods studies published in English between the 1st of January 1990 and 30th of April 2022 were included. A total of 119 studies were included. The data was synthesised using a tri-partied statistical methodology of a meta-analysis (24), pairwise meta-analysis (24) and network meta-analysis (34). Mean, median, standard deviation and confidence intervals for various pain assessments were used as the main outcomes for pre-treatment pain scores at baseline, post-treatment pain scores and pain score changes of each group. Our meta-analysis revealed the significant reduction in chronic pain scores of patients taking NSAID versus non-steroidal opioid drugs was comparative to patients given placebo under a random effects model. Pooled evidence also indicated significant drug efficiency with Botulinum Toxin Type-A (BTX-A) and Ketamine. Chronic pain is a public health problem that requires far more effective pharmaceutical interventions with minimal better side-effect profiles which will aid to develop better clinical guidelines. The importance of understanding ubiquity of pain by clinicians, policy makers, researchers and academic scholars is vital to prevent social determinant which aggravates issue.

Indexed as

Chronic PainAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsQuality of LifeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID38238384
PMCPMC10796361
OpenAlexW4390974489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.