Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238181›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2024

Use of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaires for clinical decision-making and psychological referral in ophthalmic care: a multicentre observational study.

Stefania Fortini, Eliana Costanzo, Emanuela Rellini, Filippo Amore, Silvio Paolo Mariotti, Monica Varano, Mariacristina Parravano, Gianni Virgili, Francesco Bandello, Stanislao Rizzo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Stefania FortiniNational Center of Services and Research for the Prevention of Blindness and Rehabilitation of Low Vision Patients, IAPB Italia Onlus, Rome, Italy.
Eliana CostanzoIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy eliana.costanzo@fondazionebietti.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9916-8895
Emanuela RelliniNational Center of Services and Research for the Prevention of Blindness and Rehabilitation of Low Vision Patients, IAPB Italia Onlus, Rome, Italy.
Filippo AmoreNational Center of Services and Research for the Prevention of Blindness and Rehabilitation of Low Vision Patients, IAPB Italia Onlus, Rome, Italy.
Silvio Paolo MariottiWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Monica VaranoIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Mariacristina ParravanoIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Gianni VirgiliIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BandelloDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Vita-Salute, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Stanislao RizzoOphthalmology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Simona TurcoNational Center of Services and Research for the Prevention of Blindness and Rehabilitation of Low Vision Patients, IAPB Italia Onlus, Rome, Italy.
Fondazione G.B. Bietti · ITInternational Agency for the Prevention of Blindness · GBAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of anxiety and depression on clinician decision-making in patients suffering from chronic eye disease in ophthalmological clinical practice. DESIGN AND

settingThis multicentre observational study, in collaboration with the WHO, included ophthalmologists and their patients affected by chronic eye disease. States of anxiety and depression were screened with specific questionnaires, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), self-administered by patients before the visit. In the present analysis, we report data from three major eye care centres in Italy between 2021 and 2022. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: To assess self-reported changes in ophthalmologists' clinical approach (communication style and their clinical-therapeutic strategies) and decisions after knowing questionnaire scores (primary aim), and to analyse the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores in patients with chronic eye diseases (secondary aim).

results41 ophthalmologists and 359 patients were included. The results from PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores showed critical depression and anxiety status scores (PHQ-9 ≥5 and GAD-7 ≥10) in 258 patients. In 74% of cases, no actions were taken by the ophthalmologists based on these scores; in 26% of cases, they changed their clinical approach; and in 14% of cases, they referred the patients for psychological/psychiatric evaluation.

conclusionsStates of anxiety and depression affect many patients with chronic eye conditions and need to be detected and managed early to improve patients' well-being. Providing ophthalmologists with knowledge of their patients' psychological conditions can change the clinical management and attitude towards referral for a psychological evaluation. Further studies are needed to expand our knowledge of how to raise awareness among ophthalmologists regarding multimorbidity of patients suffering from chronic eye diseases in order to achieve better clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesPatient Health QuestionnaireAnxietyAnxiety DisordersClinical Decision-MakingDepressionHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxiety disordersMedical ophthalmologyMedical retina

Identifiers

PMID38238181
PMCPMC10806828
OpenAlexW4391004214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.