Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238173›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Interaction between parental myopia and children lifestyle on the incidence of myopia among children aged 6-18 years: a cross-sectional study in Tianjin, China.

Tongtong Li, Jing Yang, Jing Yan, Xuyang Yao, Bei Du, Qi Wu, Xiangda Meng, Yuanyuan Liu, Yuezhu Lu, Qihua Wang and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Tongtong Li *School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7958-2562
Jing Yang *Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Laboratory of Molecular Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Jing Yan *School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0203-8451
Xuyang YaoTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Bei DuTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0947-1541
Qi WuSchool of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xiangda MengTianjin Key Laboratory of Ocular Trauma, Tianjin, China.
Yuanyuan LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Ocular Trauma, Tianjin, China.
Yuezhu LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qihua WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Laboratory of Molecular Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Qiang YangShenyang Xingqi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Shenyang, China.
Chea-Su KeeSchool of Optometry, Centre for Myopia Research, Research Centre for SHARP Vision, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Clement C ThamDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong KonSARg, China.
Ruihua WeiTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China zyyyanhua@tmu.edu.cn huangguowei@tmu.edu.cn weirhua2009@126.com.
Guowei HuangSchool of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China zyyyanhua@tmu.edu.cn huangguowei@tmu.edu.cn weirhua2009@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0346-6303
Hua YanTianjin Key Laboratory of Ocular Trauma, Tianjin, China zyyyanhua@tmu.edu.cn huangguowei@tmu.edu.cn weirhua2009@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7650-3320
Tianjin Medical University · CNTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CNNational Clinical Research · USChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HKGuizhou Magic Pharmaceutical (China) · CNHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKNankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to explore the influence of the interaction between parental myopia and lifestyle on myopia among school-age children.

designCross-sectional study.

settingThis study used data from the Tianjin Child and Adolescent Research of Eye between August and October 2022.

participantsA total of 49 035 participants between 6 and 18 years of age were eligible for this study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the interaction between eye-healthy lifestyle and parental myopia on myopia. Parental myopia and eye-healthy lifestyle were ascertained by a Child and Adolescent Behavior Questionnaire. The lifestyle risk score (LRS) of eye health was calculated based on beta-coefficient in the backward regression model. The interaction between LRS and parental myopia was analysed by multivariate logistic regression. The predictive value of different predicted models was estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the associations of lifestyle risk factors and parental myopia with spherical equivalent refraction, which were defined as the secondary outcomes.

resultsA total of 31 839 participants aged 6-18 years were included, and the myopia prevalence was 55.46%. Eye-healthy lifestyle and parental myopia were significantly associated with myopia, as was interaction. The predictive value for LRS & parental myopia was 0.714 (95% CI: 0.709 to 0.720), which was higher than LRS (0.693, 95% CI: 0.687 to 0.699) and parental myopia (0.710, 95% CI: 0.704 to 0.716) separately.

conclusionsHigh-risk lifestyles of myopia and parental myopia were significantly associated with a higher risk of myopia, and the combination had the strongest effect. For children, lifestyle adjustment should be prioritised in preventing myopia, especially for those with parental myopia.

Indexed as

MyopiaAdolescentChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIncidenceLife StyleParentsPrevalenceRisk FactorsAdolescentObservational StudyOPHTHALMOLOGYPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID38238173
PMCPMC10806635
OpenAlexW4391004340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.