Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38238061›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Pre-post feasibility trial of a telephone-delivered exercise intervention for patients during chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer: the ECHO-R trial protocol.

Sandra C Hayes, Rosalind R Spence, Monika Janda, Elizabeth Eakin, Catherine Shannon, Jeffrey Goh, Vanessa L Beesley, Dimitrios Vagenas, Penny Webb, Jermaine Coward and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Sandra C HayesSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia sandi.hayes@griffith.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7005-5184
Rosalind R SpenceSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5446-5562
Monika JandaFaculty of Medicine, Centre of Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1728-8085
Elizabeth EakinFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Catherine ShannonQueensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Jeffrey GohQueensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Vanessa L BeesleyPopulation Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5081-1800
Dimitrios VagenasSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Health, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Penny WebbPopulation Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jermaine CowardFaculty of Medicine and ICON Cancer Care Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Louisa G GordonPopulation Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-4249
Helene O'NeillQueensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Merran WilliamsQueensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Sheree RyeSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-9335-6254
Melissa J NewtonSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Sara BaniahmadiQueensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Marcelo NascimentoGold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
James NicklinGynaecological Cancer, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Andrea GarretQueensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Andreas ObermairQueensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUGriffith University · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUGold Coast Hospital · AUQueensland Health · AUQueensland University of Technology · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe benefits of exercise in reducing treatment-related morbidity and improving quality of life following a primary diagnosis of cancer have been well documented and have led to exercise being recommended by oncology societies for all people with a cancer diagnosis. However, these recommendations are derived from research typically involving cohorts with more common cancers and relatively good prognosis, such as breast and prostate. Evidence from these cancers may not apply to women with recurrent ovarian cancer. Therefore, the primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a home-based, telephone-delivered exercise intervention for women undergoing chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Exercise During Chemotherapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (ECHO-R) trial is a single-arm, phase II, pre/postintervention trial of a 6-month, telephone-delivered exercise intervention (consistent with recommended exercise oncology prescription). The target sample size is 80 women who are currently undergoing (or are scheduled to receive) chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. Recruitment is through participating hospital sites in Queensland, Australia, or via self-referral. The exercise intervention comprises 12 telephone sessions over a 6-month period delivered by trial-trained exercise professionals and supplemented (where feasible) by five sessions face to face. Exercise prescription is individualised and works towards an overall goal of achieving a weekly target of 150 min of moderate-intensity, mixed-mode exercise. Assessments via self-administered survey and physical fitness and function tests occur at baseline and then at 6 and 9 months postbaseline. Data to inform feasibility and safety are recorded as case notes by the exercise professional during each session. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the ECHO-R trial was granted by the Metro North Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2020/QRBW/67223) on 6 November 2020. Findings from the trial are planned to be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and both national and international exercise and oncology conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000042842.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsQuality of LifeCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialClinical Trials as TopicExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleTelephoneclinical trialfeasibility studiesgynaecological oncologysports medicine

Identifiers

PMID38238061
PMCPMC10806642
OpenAlexW4390988221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.