Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38237901›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2024

The future of CMR: All-in-one vs. real-time CMR (Part 2).

Francisco Contijoch, Volker Rasche, Nicole Seiberlich, Dana C Peters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Multi-dynamic deep image prior for cardiac MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical feasibility of two cardiac deep learning cine magnetic resonance imaging sequences: Single-breath-hold and free-breathing motion-corrected approaches.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Highlights of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2025 conference: Leading the way to accessible, efficient, and sustainable cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Review
  16. Ultrafast deep learning super-resolution single-shot T2-weighted imaging for robust edema visualization in cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francisco ContijochUniversity of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Volker RascheUlm University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine II, Ulm, Germany.
Nicole SeiberlichMichigan Institute for Imaging Technology and Translation, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Dana C PetersYale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: dana.peters@yale.edu.

Funding

Training In Cardiovascular Physiology & PharmacologyT32HL007444 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Ju Chen, Robert Scott Ross · 1985 to 2026
$11.1M
Improved MRI guidance of pediatric catheterization via autonomous multi-beat data synthesisR01HL162671 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Francisco J Contijoch · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
UCSD PRIDE Faculty Development Program in Cardiovascular SciencesR25HL145817 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Robert Scott Ross, Joann Trejo · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
Development of MR-derived parameters of LV diastolic function: Validation and Comparison to LV and LA fibrosisR01HL144706 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PETERS, DANA C · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144706NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL162671NHLBI NIH HHS R25 HL145817NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) protocols can be lengthy and complex, which has driven the research community to develop new technologies to make these protocols more efficient and patient-friendly. Two different approaches to improving CMR have been proposed, specifically "all-in-one" CMR, where several contrasts and/or motion states are acquired simultaneously, and "real-time" CMR, in which the examination is accelerated to avoid the need for breathholding and/or cardiac gating. The goal of this two-part manuscript is to describe these two different types of emerging rapid CMR protocols. To this end, the vision of all-in-one and real-time imaging are described, along with techniques which have been devised and tested along the pathway of clinical implementation. The pros and cons of the different methods are presented, and the remaining open needs of each are detailed. Part 1 tackles the "All-in-One" approaches, and Part 2 focuses on the "Real-Time" approaches along with an overall summary of these emerging methods.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPredictive Value of TestsDiffusion of InnovationForecastingHeart DiseasesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsCardiac MRICompressed sensingMagnetic Resonance FingerprintingMultitaskingParallel imagingQuantitative imagingRapid imagingReal-time imaging

Identifiers

PMID38237901
PMCPMC11211235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.