Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38237900›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2024

The future of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: All-in-one vs. real-time (Part 1).

Anthony G Christodoulou, Gastao Cruz, Ayda Arami, Sebastian Weingärtner, Jessica Artico, Dana Peters, Nicole Seiberlich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance recommendations toward environmentally sustainable cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical feasibility of two cardiac deep learning cine magnetic resonance imaging sequences: Single-breath-hold and free-breathing motion-corrected approaches.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Highlights of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2025 conference: Leading the way to accessible, efficient, and sustainable cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anthony G ChristodoulouDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gastao CruzMichigan Institute for Imaging Technology and Translation, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ayda AramiDepartment of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sebastian WeingärtnerDepartment of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Jessica ArticoBarts Heart Centre, London, UK.
Dana PetersRadiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nicole SeiberlichMichigan Institute for Imaging Technology and Translation, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: nse@med.umich.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols can be lengthy and complex, which has driven the research community to develop new technologies to make these protocols more efficient and patient-friendly. Two different approaches to improving CMR have been proposed, specifically "all-in-one" CMR, where several contrasts and/or motion states are acquired simultaneously, and "real-time" CMR, in which the examination is accelerated to avoid the need for breathholding and/or cardiac gating. The goal of this two-part manuscript is to describe these two different types of emerging rapid CMR. To this end, the vision of each is described, along with techniques which have been devised and tested along the pathway of clinical implementation. The pros and cons of the different methods are presented, and the remaining open needs of each are detailed. Part 1 will tackle the "all-in-one" approaches, and Part 2 the "real-time" approaches along with an overall summary of these emerging methods.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingPredictive Value of TestsDiffusion of InnovationForecastingHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsCardiac MRICompressed sensingMagnetic Resonance FingerprintingMultitaskingParallel imagingQuantitative imagingRapid imagingReal-time imaging

Identifiers

PMID38237900
PMCPMC11211239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.