Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38237559›Full record

ReviewACS chemical neuroscience2024

Empirical Analysis of Drug Targets for Nervous System Disorders.

Louis G Mueller, Barbara S Slusher, Takashi Tsukamoto

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louis G MuellerDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Barbara S SlusherJohns Hopkins Drug Discovery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9814-4157
Takashi TsukamotoJohns Hopkins Drug Discovery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0216-7520
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Therapeutic CoreP30MH075673 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Leah Helane Rubin · 2006 to 2026
$33.2M
Translational Aging Research Training ProgramT32AG058527 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Peter M. Abadir, Esther Seunghee Oh · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
Development of GCPII inhibitors for the treatment of age-related cognitive disordersR01AG068130 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARNSTEN, AMY F.T., SLUSHER, BARBARA STAUCH · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
Regulation of Exosome Secretion as a novel therapeutic approach for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG059799 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SLUSHER, BARBARA STAUCH, TSUKAMOTO, TAKASHI · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Development of MRGPRX1 positive allosteric modulators as non-addictive therapies for neuropathic painUH3NS115718 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TSUKAMOTO, TAKASHI · 2021 to 2023
$2.3M
Development of MRGPRX1 positive allosteric modulators as non-addictive therapies for neuropathic painUG3NS115718 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TSUKAMOTO, TAKASHI · 2019 to 2019
$1.6M
High Throughput Screen for Discovery of N-Acetyltransferase 8 Like (NAT8L) InhibitorsR33NS119659 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SLUSHER, BARBARA STAUCH, TSUKAMOTO, TAKASHI · 2023 to 2023
$409k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059799NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068130NIA NIH HHS T32 AG058527NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH075673NINDS NIH HHS R33 NS119659NINDS NIH HHS UG3 NS115718NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS115718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery and development of drugs to treat diseases of the nervous system remains challenging. There is a higher attrition rate in the clinical stage for nervous system experimental drugs compared to other disease areas. In the preclinical stage, additional challenges arise from the considerable effort required to find molecules that penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) coupled with the poor predictive value of many preclinical models of nervous system diseases. In the era of target-based drug discovery, the critical first step of drug discovery projects is the selection of a therapeutic target which is largely driven by its presumed pathogenic involvement. For nervous system diseases, however, the feasibility of identifying potent molecules within the stringent range of molecular properties necessary for BBB penetration should represent another important factor in target selection. To address the latter, the present review analyzes the distribution of human protein targets of FDA-approved drugs for nervous system disorders and compares it with drugs for other disease areas. We observed a substantial difference in the distribution of therapeutic targets across the two clusters. We expanded on this finding by analyzing the physicochemical properties of nervous and non-nervous system drugs in each target class by using the central nervous system multiparameter optimization (CNS MPO) algorithm. These data may serve as useful guidance in making more informed decisions when selecting therapeutic targets for nervous system disorders.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesBlood-Brain BarrierCentral Nervous SystemCentral Nervous System AgentsDrug DiscoveryHumansCentral Nervous System AgentsCNS MPODruggabilityNervous systemTherapeutic targets

Identifiers

PMID38237559
PMCPMC10988710
OpenAlexW4390963635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.