Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38237144›Full record

SynthesisHuman reproduction update2024

Sexual function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hester Pastoor, Aya Mousa, Hanneke Bolt, Wichor Bramer, Tania S Burgert, Anuja Dokras, Chau Thien Tay, Helena J Teede, Joop Laven

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human reproduction update, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sexual dysfunction in women with PCOS: a case control study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hester PastoorDivision of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9930-6816
Aya MousaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University and Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-4523
Hanneke BoltDivision of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wichor BramerMedical Library, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-9180
Tania S BurgertDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-7946-5314
Anuja DokrasPenn Medicine, Penn Fertility Care, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1085-3969
Chau Thien TayMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University and Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6228-2654
Helena J TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University and Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7609-577X
Joop LavenDivision of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5444-9845
Erasmus MC · NLMonash Health · AUChildren's Mercy Hospital · USPenn Center for AIDS Research · US

Funding

Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDivision of Reproductive MedicineDivision of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MCErasmus MCMonash UniversityNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNetherlands and the Centre for Research Excellence in Women's Health in Reproductive LifeUniversity Medical Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common and distressing endocrine disorder associated with lower quality of life, subfertility, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, depression, anxiety, and eating disorders. PCOS characteristics, its comorbidities, and its treatment can potentially influence sexual function. However, studies on sexual function in women with PCOS are limited and contradictory. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The aim was to perform a systematic review of the published literature on sexual function in women with PCOS and assess the quality of the research and certainty of outcomes, to inform the 2023 International Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of PCOS. SEARCH

methodsEight electronic databases were searched until 1 June 2023. Studies reporting on sexual function using validated sexuality questionnaires or visual analogue scales (VAS) in PCOS populations were included. Random-effects models were used for meta-analysis comparing PCOS and non-PCOS groups with Hedges' g as the standardized mean difference. Study quality and certainty of outcomes were assessed by risk of bias assessments and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method according to Cochrane. Funnel plots were visually inspected for publication bias. OUTCOMES: There were 32 articles included, of which 28 used validated questionnaires and four used VAS. Pooled Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores in random-effects models showed worse sexual function across most subdomains in women with PCOS, including arousal (Hedges's g [Hg] [95% CI] = -0.35 [-0.53, -0.17], I2 = 82%, P < 0.001), lubrication (Hg [95% CI] = -0.54 [-0.79, -0.30], I2 = 90%, P < 0.001), orgasm (Hg [95% CI] = -0.37 [-0.56, -0.19], I2 = 83%, P < 0.001), and pain (Hg [95% CI] = -0.36 [-0.59, -0.13] I2 = 90%, P < 0.001), as well as total sexual function (Hg [95% CI] = -0.75 [-1.37, -0.12], I2 = 98%, P  =  0.02) and sexual satisfaction (Hg [95% CI] = -0.31 [-0.45, -0.18], I2 = 68%, P < 0.001). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on fertility status and body mass index (BMI) did not alter the direction or significance of the results. Meta-analysis on the VAS studies demonstrated the negative impact of excess body hair on sexuality, lower sexual attractiveness, and lower sexual satisfaction in women with PCOS compared to controls, with no differences in the perceived importance of a satisfying sex life. No studies assessed sexual distress. GRADE assessments showed low certainty across all outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Psychosexual function appears to be impaired in those with PCOS, but there is a lack of evidence on the related distress scores, which are required to meet the criteria for psychosexual dysfunction. Health care professionals should discuss sexual function and distress and be aware of the multifactorial influences on sexual function in PCOS. Future research needs to assess both psychosexual function and distress to aid in understanding the degree of psychosexual dysfunction in PCOS. Finally, more diverse populations (e.g. non-heterosexual and more ethnically diverse groups) should be included in future studies and the efficacy of treatments for sexual dysfunction should also be assessed (e.g. lifestyle and pharmacological interventions).

Indexed as

Polycystic Ovary SyndromeSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansQuality of LifeSexual Behaviorfemale sexual functionpolycystic ovary syndromesex counsellingsexual arousalsexualitysexual satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38237144
PMCPMC11063549
OpenAlexW4390964556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.