ArticleJCO precision oncology2024
Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in the Management of Colorectal Cancer.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of circulating tumour DNA in guiding postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis based on cohort studies.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Trajectory identification of high-risk subgroups after colorectal cancer surgery in patients with minimal residual disease: a single-center longitudinal study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Tumor-naïve ctDNA detection with deep learning-enhanced error suppression for sensitive mutation calling.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Multistep ctDNA Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: From Tissue NGS to Highly Sensitive Digital PCR Platforms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancing gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a narrative review of circulating tumor DNA in gastrointestinal malignancies.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- ctDNA in the Management of Resectable & Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
- Contemporary Use of ctDNA for the Colorectal Surgeon.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Japan society of clinical oncology position paper on appropriate clinical use of molecular residual disease (MRD) testing.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Detecting Early Recurrence With Circulating Tumor DNA in Stage I-III Biliary Tract Cancer After Curative Resection.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Early Recurrence Following Locoregional Therapy for Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
- Mapping the Future: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Harnessing Minimal Residual Disease as a Predictor for Colorectal Cancer: Promising Horizons Amidst Challenges.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRecurrence after curative-intent treatment occurs in 20%-50% of patients with stage II-IV colorectal cancer (CRC), underscoring the need for early detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Here, we examined the pattern of use of a tumor-informed ctDNA assay in CRC MRD monitoring in routine clinical practice at Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of health records of patients with CRC who had at least one tumor-informed ctDNA assay from May 2019 through July 1, 2022. Recurrence was defined as radiographic evidence of disease. Descriptive characteristics of the cohort, ctDNA results, and subsequent interventions were recorded.
resultsOf the 120 patients included, the median age at diagnosis was 67 years, 46% were female, and 94% were White. At diagnosis, 10 patients had stage I, 23 stage II, 60 stage III, and 25 stage IV disease. Of 476 ctDNA assays performed, 70% were performed in patients who had recurrent disease most commonly to monitor the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and 16% resulted in a change in clinical decision making. There were 110 recurrences identified in 62 patients, as some patients experienced more than one recurrence over time. Compared with serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, ctDNA results correlated better with radiologic imaging.
conclusionRoutine ctDNA monitoring for MRD detection has been adopted in clinical practice; however, 84% of ctDNA assays performed did not result in a change in clinical management. This suggests the need for further clinical research data to guide routine clinical use of ctDNA MRD testing in CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.