ArticlePloS one2024
Development and validation of a multi-dimensional diagnosis-based comorbidity index that improves prediction of death in men with prostate cancer: Nationwide, population-based register study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy using comprehensive summary measures of medical history: nationwide, population-based study in Sweden.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Temporal trends in diagnostic work-up, treatment, and mortality in locally advanced prostate cancer in 2016-2024: nationwide, population-based study in Sweden.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Incidence and prognostic implications of PSA relapse after radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a population-based study.BJU international · 2026Article
- Survival after spinal surgery for metastases in men with castration-sensitive vs castration-resistant prostate cancer: a nationwide register-based study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimised comorbidity indices can reflect patient performance status in register based studies of prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Characteristics, treatment patterns and healthcare resource use of Finnish men with prostate cancer.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Potential gains from radical treatment of men with prostate cancer according to life expectancy.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Cohort Profile Update: The National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden and PCBase.International journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Adaption of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Nomograms for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer-specific Death in Sweden: A Population-based Cohort Study.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Incidence and prognostic implications of prostate-specific antigen persistence and relapse after radical prostatectomy: population-based study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Functional outcomes after primary vs delayed robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following active surveillance.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Article
- Discriminative Ability of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for Long-Term Mortality in a General Population: Nationwide, Population-Based Study of 10 Million Adults in Sweden.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Article
- The long-term conditional mortality rate in older ICU patients compared to the general population.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessment of comorbidity is crucial for confounding adjustment and prediction of mortality in register-based studies, but the commonly used Charlson comorbidity index is not sufficiently predictive. We aimed to develop a multidimensional diagnosis-based comorbidity index (MDCI) that captures comorbidity better than the Charlson Comorbidity index. The index was developed based on 286,688 men free of prostate cancer randomly selected from the Swedish general population, and validated in 54,539 men without and 68,357 men with prostate cancer. All ICD-10 codes from inpatient and outpatient discharges during 10 years prior to the index date were used to define variables indicating frequency of code occurrence, recency, and total duration of related hospital admissions. Penalized Cox regression was used to predict 10-year all-cause mortality. The MDCI predicted risk of death better than the Charlson comorbidity index, with a c-index of 0.756 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.751, 0.762) vs 0.688 (95% CI = 0.683, 0.693) in the validation cohort of men without prostate cancer. Men in the lowest vs highest MDCI quartile had distinctively different survival in the validation cohort of men with prostate cancer, with an overall hazard ratio [HR] of 5.08 (95% CI = 4.90, 5.26). This was also consistent within strata of age and Charlson comorbidity index, e.g. HR = 5.90 (95% CI = 4.65, 7.50) in men younger than 60 years with CCI 0. These results indicate that comorbidity assessment in register-based studies can be improved by use of all ICD-10 codes and taking related frequency, recency, and duration of hospital admissions into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.