Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236932›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Cohort profile: The ENTWINE iCohort study, a multinational longitudinal web-based study of informal care.

Saif Elayan, Eva Bei, Giulia Ferraris, Oliver Fisher, Mikołaj Zarzycki, Viola Angelini, Lena Ansmann, Erik Buskens, Mariët Hagedoorn, Milena von Kutzleben and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Saif ElayanFaculty of Economics and Business, Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0553-7822
Eva BeiFaculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Giulia FerrarisDepartment of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Oliver FisherDepartment of Economics and Social Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2787-2899
Mikołaj ZarzyckiDepartment of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8357-563X
Viola AngeliniFaculty of Economics and Business, Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lena AnsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Organizational Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Erik BuskensDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mariët HagedoornDepartment of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Milena von KutzlebenDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Organizational Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Giovanni LamuraIRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, Ancona, Italy.
Anne LooijmansDepartment of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robbert SandermanDepartment of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Noa VilchinskyFaculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Val MorrisonSchool of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4308-8976
University Medical Center Groningen · NLBar-Ilan University · ILCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEUniversity of Groningen · NLBangor University · GBIstituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani · ITLiverpool Hope University · GBMarche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informal care is a key pillar of long-term care provision across Europe and will likely play an even greater role in the future. Thus, research that enhances our understanding of caregiving experiences becomes increasingly relevant. The ENTWINE iCohort Study examines the personal, psychological, social, economic, and geographic factors that shape caregiving experiences. Here, we present the baseline cohort of the study and describe its design, recruitment methods, data collection procedures, measures, and early baseline findings. The study was conducted in nine countries: Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The study comprised a web-based longitudinal survey (baseline + 6-month follow-up) and optional weekly diary assessments conducted separately with caregivers and care recipients. From 14 August 2020 to 31 August 2021, 1872 caregivers and 402 care recipients were enrolled at baseline. Participants were recruited via Facebook and, to a lesser extent, via the study website or caregiver/patient organisations. Caregiver participants were predominantly female (87%) and primary caregivers (82%), with a median age of 55 years. A large proportion (80%) held at least post-secondary education, and two-thirds were married/partnered. Over half of the caregivers were employed (53%) and caring for a person with multiple chronic conditions (56%), and nearly three-quarters were caring for either a parent (42%) or a spouse/partner (32%). About three-quarters of care recipient participants were female (77%), not employed (74%), and had at least post-secondary education (77%), with a median age of 55 years. Over half of the care recipients were married/partnered (59%), receiving care primarily from their spouses/partners (61%), and diagnosed with multiple chronic conditions (57%). This study examining numerous potential influences on caregiving experiences provides an opportunity to better understand the multidimensional nature of these experiences. Such data could have implications for developing caregiving services and policies, and for future informal care research.

Indexed as

Multiple Chronic ConditionsCaregiversEuropeFemaleHumansInternetLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care

Identifiers

PMID38236932
PMCPMC10796045
OpenAlexW4390968779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.