ArticlePloS one2024
Kuura-An automated workflow for analyzing WES and WGS data.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- GATES: A Lightweight Tool Automating Pathogenic Variant Discovery From Raw Whole-Exome Sequencing Data.Cancer informatics · 2026Article
- GermVarX: A Robust Workflow for Joint Germline Variant Exploration in whole-exome sequencing cohorts.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has revolutionized the field of genomic sciences by cutting down the cost and time associated with standard sequencing methods. This advancement has not only provided the research community with an abundance of data but has also presented the challenge of analyzing it. The paramount challenge in analyzing the copious amount of data is in using the optimal resources in terms of available tools. To address this research gap, we propose "Kuura-An automated workflow for analyzing WES and WGS data", which is optimized for both whole exome and whole genome sequencing data. This workflow is based on the nextflow pipeline scripting language and uses docker to manage and deploy the workflow. The workflow consists of four analysis stages-quality control, mapping to reference genome & quality score recalibration, variant calling & variant recalibration and variant consensus & annotation. An important feature of the DNA-seq workflow is that it uses the combination of multiple variant callers (GATK Haplotypecaller, DeepVariant, VarScan2, Freebayes and Strelka2), generating a list of high-confidence variants in a consensus call file. The workflow is flexible as it integrates the fragmented tools and can be easily extended by adding or updating tools or amending the parameters list. The use of a single parameters file enhances reproducibility of the results. The ease of deployment and usage of the workflow further increases computational reproducibility providing researchers with a standardized tool for the variant calling step in different projects. The source code, instructions for installation and use of the tool are publicly available at our github repository https://github.com/dhanaprakashj/kuura_pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.