Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236900›Full record

ReviewPloS one2024

Hybrid feature selection and classification technique for early prediction and severity of diabetes type 2.

Praveen Talari, Bharathiraja N, Gaganpreet Kaur, Hani Alshahrani, Mana Saleh Al Reshan, Adel Sulaiman, Asadullah Shaikh

Expression of concernOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Praveen TalariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, India.
Bharathiraja NChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University Punjab, Rajpura, India.
Gaganpreet KaurChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University Punjab, Rajpura, India.
Hani AlshahraniDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Mana Saleh Al ReshanDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Adel SulaimanDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Asadullah ShaikhDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4806-6159
Najran University · SAChitkara University · INChaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes prediction is an ongoing study topic in which medical specialists are attempting to forecast the condition with greater precision. Diabetes typically stays lethargic, and on the off chance that patients are determined to have another illness, like harm to the kidney vessels, issues with the retina of the eye, or a heart issue, it can cause metabolic problems and various complexities in the body. Various worldwide learning procedures, including casting a ballot, supporting, and sacking, have been applied in this review. The Engineered Minority Oversampling Procedure (Destroyed), along with the K-overlay cross-approval approach, was utilized to achieve class evening out and approve the discoveries. Pima Indian Diabetes (PID) dataset is accumulated from the UCI Machine Learning (UCI ML) store for this review, and this dataset was picked. A highlighted engineering technique was used to calculate the influence of lifestyle factors. A two-phase classification model has been developed to predict insulin resistance using the Sequential Minimal Optimisation (SMO) and SMOTE approaches together. The SMOTE technique is used to preprocess data in the model's first phase, while SMO classes are used in the second phase. All other categorization techniques were outperformed by bagging decision trees in terms of Misclassification Error rate, Accuracy, Specificity, Precision, Recall, F1 measures, and ROC curve. The model was created using a combined SMOTE and SMO strategy, which achieved 99.07% correction with 0.1 ms of runtime. The suggested system's result is to enhance the classifier's performance in spotting illness early.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ForecastingHumansMachine LearningROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID38236900
PMCPMC10796060
OpenAlexW4390969254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.