Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236841›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

High-resolution genomic analysis to investigate the impact of the invasive brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) and other wildlife on microbial water quality assessments.

Marie Moinet, Lynn Rogers, Patrick Biggs, Jonathan Marshall, Richard Muirhead, Megan Devane, Rebecca Stott, Adrian Cookson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marie MoinetHopkirk Research Institute, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8833-2717
Lynn RogersHopkirk Research Institute, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Patrick BiggsmEpiLab, School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0285-4101
Jonathan MarshallSchool of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Richard MuirheadInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
Megan DevaneInstitute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd. (ESR), Christchurch, New Zealand.
Rebecca StottNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Hamilton, New Zealand.
Adrian CooksonHopkirk Research Institute, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8197-3386
AgResearch · NZMassey University · NZNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research · NZNew Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli are routine indicators of fecal contamination in water quality assessments. Contrary to livestock and human activities, brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula), common invasive marsupials in Aotearoa/New Zealand, have not been thoroughly studied as a source of fecal contamination in freshwater. To investigate their potential role, Escherichia spp. isolates (n = 420) were recovered from possum gut contents and feces and were compared to those from water, soil, sediment, and periphyton samples, and from birds and other introduced mammals collected within the Mākirikiri Reserve, Dannevirke. Isolates were characterized using E. coli-specific real-time PCR targeting the uidA gene, Sanger sequencing of a partial gnd PCR product to generate a gnd sequence type (gST), and for 101 isolates, whole genome sequencing. Escherichia populations from 106 animal and environmental sample enrichments were analyzed using gnd metabarcoding. The alpha diversity of Escherichia gSTs was significantly lower in possums and animals compared with aquatic environmental samples, and some gSTs were shared between sample types, e.g., gST535 (in 85% of samples) and gST258 (71%). Forty percent of isolates gnd-typed and 75% of reads obtained by metabarcoding had gSTs shared between possums, other animals, and the environment. Core-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis showed limited variation between several animal and environmental isolates (<10 SNPs). Our data show at an unprecedented scale that Escherichia clones are shared between possums, other wildlife, water, and the wider environment. These findings support the potential role of possums as contributors to fecal contamination in Aotearoa/New Zealand freshwater. Our study deepens the current knowledge of Escherichia populations in under-sampled wildlife. It presents a successful application of high-resolution genomic methods for fecal source tracking, thereby broadening the analytical toolbox available to water quality managers. Phylogenetic analysis of isolates and profiling of Escherichia populations provided useful information on the source(s) of fecal contamination and suggest that comprehensive invasive species management strategies may assist in restoring not only ecosystem health but also water health where microbial water quality is compromised.

Indexed as

Animals, WildTrichosurusAnimalsEcosystemEscherichia coliGenomicsHumansNew ZealandPhylogenyWater Quality

Identifiers

PMID38236841
PMCPMC10796070
OpenAlexW4390970857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.