Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236840›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2024

Impact on wine sales of removing the largest serving size by the glass: An A-B-A reversal trial in 21 pubs, bars, and restaurants in England.

Eleni Mantzari, Minna Ventsel, Emily Pechey, Ilse Lee, Mark A Pilling, Gareth J Hollands, Theresa M Marteau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleni MantzariBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3147-5079
Minna VentselBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8308-9140
Emily PecheyBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ilse LeeBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7674-6090
Mark A PillingBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7446-6597
Gareth J HollandsBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-3924
Theresa M MarteauBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-1129

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206853/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions that alter aspects of the physical environments in which unhealthy behaviours occur have the potential to change behaviour at scale, i.e., across populations, and thereby decrease the risk of several diseases. One set of such interventions involves reducing serving sizes, which could reduce alcohol consumption. The effect of modifying the available range of serving sizes of wine in a real-world setting is unknown. We aimed to assess the impact on the volume of wine sold of removing the largest serving size by the glass from the options available in licensed premises. METHODS AND

findingsThe study was conducted between September 2021 and May 2022 in 21 licensed premises in England that sold wine by the glass in serving sizes greater than 125 ml (i.e., 175 ml or 250 ml) and used an electronic point of sale till system. It used an A-B-A reversal design, set over 3 four-weekly periods. "A" represented the nonintervention periods during which standard serving sizes were served and "B" the intervention period when the largest serving size for a glass of wine was removed from the existing range in each establishment: 250 ml (18 premises) or 175 ml (3 premises). The primary outcome was the daily volume of wine sold, extracted from sales data. Twenty-one premises completed the study, 20 of which did so per protocol and were included in the primary analysis. After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the intervention resulted in -420·8 millilitres (ml) (95% confidence intervals (CIs) -681·4 to -160·2 p = 0·002) or -7·6% (95% CI -12·3%, -2·9%) less wine being sold per day. There was no evidence that sales of beer and cider or total daily revenues changed but the study was not powered to detect differences in these outcomes. The main study limitation is that we were unable to assess the sales of other alcoholic drinks apart from wine, beer, and cider, estimated to comprise approximately 30% of alcoholic drinks sold in participating premises.

conclusionsRemoving the largest serving size of wine by the glass from those available reduced the volume of wine sold. This promising intervention for decreasing alcohol consumption across populations merits consideration as part of alcohol licensing regulations.

trial registrationISRCTN https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN33169631; OSF https://osf.io/xkgdb.

Indexed as

WineAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesEnglandHumansRestaurantsServing Size

Identifiers

PMID38236840
PMCPMC10796003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.