Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236797›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Assessing the impact of the president's emergency plan for AIDS relief on all-cause mortality.

Gary Gaumer, Yiqun Luan, Dhwani Hariharan, William Crown, Jennifer Kates, Monica Jordan, Clare L Hurley, Allyala Nandakumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Global Health in the Age of Trumpism.Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gary GaumerInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Yiqun LuanInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7275-1848
Dhwani HariharanInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.
William CrownInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8822-2737
Jennifer KatesGlobal Health & HIV Policy Program, KFF, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Monica JordanInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4080-0267
Clare L HurleyInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3304-1258
Allyala NandakumarInstitute for Global Health and Development, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Brandeis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study estimated the impacts of PEPFAR on all-cause mortality (ACM) rates (deaths per 1,000 population) across PEPFAR recipient countries from 2004-2018. As PEPFAR moves into its 3rd decade, this study supplements the existing literature on PEPFAR 's overall effectiveness in saving lives by focusing impact estimates on the important subgroups of countries that received different intensities of aid, and provides estimates of impact for different phases of this 15-year period study. The study uses a country-level panel data set of 157 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) from 1990-2018, including 90 PEPFAR recipient countries receiving bilateral aid from the U.S. government, employing difference-in-differences (DID) econometric models with several model specifications, including models with differing baseline covariates, and models with yearly covariates including other donor spending and domestic health spending. Using five different model specifications, a 10-21% decline in ACM rates from 2004 to 2018 is attributed to PEPFAR presence in the group of 90 recipient countries. Declines are somewhat larger (15-25%) in those countries that are subject to PEPFAR's country operational planning (COP) process, and where PEPFAR per capita aid amounts are largest (17-27%). Across the 90 recipient countries we study, the average impact across models is estimated to be a 7.6% reduction in ACM in the first 5-year period (2004-2008), somewhat smaller in the second 5-year period (5.5%) and in the third 5-year period (4.7%). In COP countries the impacts show decreases in ACM of 7.4% in the first period attributed to PEPFAR, 7.7% reductions in the second, and 6.6% reductions in the third. PEPFAR presence is correlated with large declines in the ACM rate, and the overall life-saving results persisted over time. The effects of PEFAR on ACM have been large, suggesting the possibility of spillover life-saving impacts of PEPFAR programming beyond HIV disease alone.

Identifiers

PMID38236797
PMCPMC10796053
OpenAlexW4390970338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.