Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236697›Full record

SynthesisJournal of global health2024

Factors and outcomes for placental anomalies: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Dazhi Fan, Dongxin Lin, Jiaming Rao, Pengsheng Li, Gengdong Chen, Zixing Zhou, Li Sun, Li Liu, Yubo Ma, Xiaoling Guo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dazhi FanFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Dongxin LinFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Jiaming RaoFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Pengsheng LiFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Gengdong ChenFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Zixing ZhouFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Li SunDepartment of Library, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Library, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yubo MaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xiaoling GuoFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Zhengping LiuFoshan Fetal Medicine Research Institute, Foshan Women and Children Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Foshan Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital · CNAnhui Medical University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Placental anomalies, including placenta previa (PP), placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS), and vase previa (VP), are associated with several adverse foetal-neonatal and maternal complications. However, there is still a lack of robust evidence on the pathogenesis and adverse outcomes of the diseases. Through this umbrella review, we aimed to systematically review existing meta-analyses exploring the factors and outcomes for pregnancy women with placental anomalies. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023. We used AMSTAR 2 to assess the quality of the reviews and estimated the pooled risk and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each meta-analysis. Results: We included 34 meta-analyses and extracted 55 factors (27 for PP, 22 for PAS, and 6 for VP) and 16 outcomes (12 for PP, and 4 for VP) to assess their credibility. Seven factors (maternal cocaine use (for PP), uterine leiomyoma (for PP), prior abortion (spontaneous) (PP), threatened miscarriage (PP), maternal obesity (PP), maternal smoking (PAS), male foetus (PAS)) had high epidemiological evidence. Twelve factors and six outcomes had moderate epidemiological evidence. Twenty-two factors and eight outcomes showed significant association, but with weak credibility. Conclusions: We found varying levels of evidence for placental anomalies of different factors and outcomes in this umbrella review. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42022300160.

Indexed as

PlacentaPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPlacenta PreviaPregnancyPrenatal CareSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38236697
PMCPMC10795857
OpenAlexW4390971729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.