Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236627›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2024

The Impact of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening on Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality in China: 13-Year Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study.

Xiaohao Ruan, Ning Zhang, Dawei Wang, Jingyi Huang, Jinlun Huang, Da Huang, Tsun Tsun Stacia Chun, Brian Sze Ho Ho, Ada Tsui-Lin Ng, James Hok-Leung Tsu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaohao Ruan *Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8373-5237
Ning Zhang *Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1374-3052
Dawei Wang *Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3063-0874
Jingyi HuangDepartment of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5590-8954
Jinlun HuangDepartment of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4568-3477
Da HuangDepartment of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6203-9459
Tsun Tsun Stacia ChunDepartment of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0009-0009-6715-7815
Brian Sze Ho HoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-9893-1326
Ada Tsui-Lin NgDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0009-0003-8788-6616
James Hok-Leung TsuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0003-4373-500X
Yongle ZhanDepartment of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-7378-1915
Rong NaDepartment of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0001-7470-5108
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HKQueen Mary Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe status of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is unclear in China. Evidence regarding the optimal frequency and interval of serial screening for prostate cancer (PCa) is disputable.

objectiveThis study aimed to depict the status of PSA screening and to explore the optimal screening frequency for PCa in China.

methodsA 13-year prospective cohort study was conducted using the Chinese Electronic Health Records Research in Yinzhou study's data set. A total of 420,941 male participants aged ≥45 years were included between January 2009 and June 2022. Diagnosis of PCa, cancer-specific death, and all-cause death were obtained from the electronic health records and vital statistic system. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated using Cox regression analysis.

resultsThe cumulative rate of ever PSA testing was 17.9% with an average annual percent change (AAPC) of 8.7% (95% CI 3.6%-14.0%) in the past decade in China. People with an older age, a higher BMI, higher waist circumference, tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking behaviors, higher level of physical activity, medication use, and comorbidities were more likely to receive PSA screening, whereas those with a lower education level and a widowed status were less likely to receive the test. People receiving serial screening ≥3 times were at a 67% higher risk of PCa detection (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.48-1.88) but a 64% lower risk of PCa-specific mortality (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.18-0.70) and a 28% lower risk of overall mortality (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.67-0.77). People following a serial screening strategy at least once every 4 years were at a 25% higher risk of PCa detection (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.13-1.36) but 70% (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.16-0.57) and 23% (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.73-0.82) lower risks of PCa-specific and all-cause mortality, respectively.

conclusionsThis study reveals a low coverage of PSA screening in China and provides the first evidence of its benefits in the general Chinese population. The findings of this study indicate that receiving serial screening at least once every 4 years is beneficial for overall and PCa-specific survival. Further studies based on a nationwide population and with long-term follow-up are warranted to identify the optimal screening interval in China.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerProstatic NeoplasmsChinaCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenChinacohort studyelectronic health recordincidencemortalityprostate cancerprostate screeningprostate-specific antigenPSAscreening interval

Identifiers

PMID38236627
PMCPMC10835592
OpenAlexW4390972850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.