Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236600›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2024

Neurostimulation for Advanced Parkinson Disease and Quality of Life at 5 Years: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Stefanie T Jost, Salima Aloui, Julian Evans, Keyoumars Ashkan, Anna Sauerbier, Alexandra Rizos, Jan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer, Alexandra Gronostay, Gereon R Fink, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle and 7 more

Abstract readControlled Clinical TrialObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of STN-DBS treatment on voice characteristics in patients with Parkinson's Disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Stefanie T JostUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany.
Salima AlouiUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany.
Julian EvansDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Keyoumars AshkanParkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Anna SauerbierUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany.
Alexandra RizosParkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Jan Niklas Petry-SchmelzerUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany.
Alexandra GronostayUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany.
Gereon R FinkUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany.
Veerle Visser-VandewalleUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Cologne, Germany.
Angelo AntoniniDepartment of Neurosciences (DNS), Padova University, Padova, Italy.
Monty SilverdaleDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Lars TimmermannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Pablo Martinez-MartinCenter for Networked Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.
K Ray ChaudhuriParkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Haidar S DafsariUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany.
International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society Non-Motor Parkinson’s Disease Study Group and EUROPAR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) improves quality of life (QOL) in patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD). However, controlled studies with more than 3 years of follow-up are lacking. Objective: To investigate the long-term effects of STN-DBS on QOL compared with standard-of-care medication (MED). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective, observational, quasi-experimental, longitudinal nonrandomized controlled trial, 183 patients were screened for eligibility and 167 were enrolled from March 1, 2011, to May 31, 2017, at 3 European university centers. Propensity score matching for demographic and clinical characteristics was applied to 108 patients with PD (62 in the STN-DBS group and 46 in the MED group), resulting in a well-balanced, matched subcohort of 25 patients per group. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to January 2023. Exposure: Treatment for PD of STN-DBS or MED. Main Outcomes and Measures: Assessments included Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 8 (PDQ-8), Unified PD Rating Scale-motor examination, Scales for Outcomes in PD-activities of daily living (ADL) and motor complications, and levodopa-equivalent daily dose. Within-group longitudinal outcome changes, between-group differences, and correlations of change scores were analyzed. Results: The study population in the analysis included 108 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [8.3] years; 66 [61.1%] male). At 5-year follow-up, PDQ-8 and ADL worsened only in the MED group (PDQ-8 change, -10.9; 95% CI, -19.0 to -2.7; P = .01; ADL change: -2.0; 95% CI, -3.1 to -0.8; P = .002), whereas both outcomes remained stable in the STN-DBS group (PDQ-8 change, -4.3; 95% CI, -13.2 to 4.7; P = .34; ADL change, -0.8; 95% CI, -2.5 to 1.0; P = .38). Changes in PDQ-8 and ADL correlated moderately (rs = .40, P = .008). Furthermore, STN-DBS outcomes were favorable for motor complications (median difference in change scores between STN-DBS and MED, -2.0; 95% CI, -4.0 to -1.0; P = .003), mobility (-1.0; 95% CI, -2.0 to 0; P = .03), and levodopa-equivalent daily dose reduction (-821.4; 95% CI, -1111.9 to -530.8; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides evidence of differences in QOL outcomes at 5-year follow-up between STN-DBS (stable) and MED (worsened), mainly driven by the favorable effect of STN-DBS on mobility (class IIb evidence). The association between changes in QOL and ADL, but not motor impairment or complications, highlights the relative importance of ADL outcomes for long-term DBS assessments. Trial Registration: German ClinicalTrials Registry: DRKS00006735.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAgedFemaleHumansLevodopaMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesLevodopa

Identifiers

PMID38236600
PMCPMC10797423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.