Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236573›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024

Innovations in textile wastewater management: a review of zero liquid discharge technology.

Ashok Pundir, Mohindra Singh Thakur, Radha, Bhaskar Goel, Suraj Prakash, Neeraj Kumari, Niharika Sharma, Ettiyagounder Parameswari, Marisennayya Senapathy, Sunil Kumar and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ashok PundirSchool of Core Engineering, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173229, India.
Mohindra Singh ThakurSchool of Core Engineering, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173229, India.
RadhaSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, 173229, India.
Bhaskar GoelSchool of Core Engineering, Shoolini University, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173229, India.
Suraj PrakashSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, 173229, India.
Neeraj KumariSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, 173229, India.
Niharika SharmaSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, 173229, India.
Ettiyagounder ParameswariNammazhvar Organic Farming Research Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India.
Marisennayya SenapathyDepartment of Rural Development and Agricultural Extension, College of Agriculture, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Sunil KumarIndian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, 250110, India.
Sangram DhumalDivision of Horticulture, RCSM College of Agriculture, Kolhapur, 416004, India.
Sheetal Vishal DeshmukhBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Yashwantrao Mohite Institute of Management, Karad, India.
Jose Manuel LorenzoCentro Tecnológico de La Carne de Galicia, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, Avd. Galicia No 4, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900, Ourense, Spain.
Manoj KumarChemical and Biochemical Processing Division, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, 400019, India. manoj.kumar13@icar.gov.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-6497
Shoolini University · INBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · INCentro Tecnológico de Automoción de Galicia · ESICAR - Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology · INTamil Nadu Agricultural University · INWolaita Sodo University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) technology emerges as a transformative solution for sustainable wastewater management in the textile industry, emphasizing water recycling and discharge minimization. This review comprehensively explores ZLD's pivotal role in reshaping wastewater management practices within the textile sector. With a primary focus on water recycling and minimized discharge, the review thoroughly examines the economic and environmental dimensions of ZLD. Additionally, it includes a comparative cost analysis against conventional wastewater treatment methods and offers a comprehensive outlook on the global ZLD market. Presently valued at US $0.71 billion, the market is anticipated to reach US $1.76 billion by 2026, reflecting a robust annual growth rate of 12.6%. Despite ZLD's efficiency in wastewater recovery, environmental challenges, such as heightened greenhouse gas emissions, increased carbon footprint, elevated energy consumption, and chemical usage, are discussed. Methodologies employed in this review involve an extensive analysis of existing literature, empirical data, and case studies on ZLD implementation in the textile industry worldwide. While acknowledging existing adoption barriers, the review underscores ZLD's potential to guide the textile industry toward a more sustainable and environmentally responsible future.

Indexed as

WastewaterWater PurificationRecyclingTechnologyTextile IndustryWaterWastewaterWaterSustainabilityTextileWastewater treatmentZero liquid discharge

Identifiers

PMID38236573
OpenAlexW4390971898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.