ArticleArchives of dermatological research2024
Chemical exposures and demographic associations in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: a large single institution physician validated cohort study.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a rare group of T-cell neoplasms which infiltrate the skin and can result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for CTCL are still poorly understood though recent studies suggest chemical exposures may play a role in its development. To further characterize patient-centered risk factors for CTCL, especially compared with matched controls, we performed one of the largest prospective cohort survey studies to date to examine patient-reported exposures and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in association with concurrent clinical disease characteristics. Patient demographics, lifestyle factors, and chemical exposures were collected via clinical data and surveys. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Chi-square tests and t tests were utilized to compare patient-reported exposures and HRQoL in patients with CTCL versus matched healthy controls (HC). Statistically significant differences were identified between patients and HC in terms of race (non-white race 22.4% in CTCL patients vs. 18.8% in HC, P = 0.01), and education level (high school or less 41.6% in CTCL patients vs. 14.3% in HC, P = 0.001), but not with Fitzpatrick skin type (P = 0.11) or smoking status (P = 0.28). Notably, 36.0% of the CTCL patients reported exposures to chemicals, a near threefold increased percentage when compared to HC (12.9%). Among various chemical exposures, 27.0% of the CTCL patients specifically reported industrial chemical exposure, a more than two-fold increased percentage when compared to HC (12.9%). Itch and pain were significantly associated with skin disease severity (as evaluated by CTCL-specific mSWAT score) in advanced stage disease (stages IIB-IVB) (r = 0.48 and 0.57, P < 0.05). Itch and body mass index (BMI) were weakly associated with skin disease severity in early-stage disease (stages IA-IIA) (r = 0.27 and 0.20, P < 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.