Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236328›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2024

Genetic assessment of captive breeding program of Indian Pangolin: implications for conservation and management.

Lenrik Konchok Wangmo, Gul Jabin, Avijit Ghosh, Prajnashree Priyambada, Supriyo Dalui, Bheem Dutt Joshi, Vinaya Kumar Singh, Stanzin Dolker, Rajesh Kumar Mohapatra, Manoj V Nair and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lenrik Konchok WangmoZoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India.
Gul JabinZoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India.
Avijit GhoshZoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India.
Prajnashree PriyambadaZoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India.
Supriyo DaluiZoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India.
Bheem Dutt JoshiZoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India.
Vinaya Kumar SinghZoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India.
Stanzin DolkerZoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India.
Rajesh Kumar MohapatraNandankanan Zoological Park, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 754005, India.
Manoj V NairNandankanan Zoological Park, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 754005, India.
Lalit Kumar SharmaZoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India.
Mukesh ThakurZoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India. thamukesh@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaptive breeding programs play a vital role in conservation of threatened species, necessitating an understanding of genetic diversity among captive individuals to ensure long-term genetic viability, appropriate mate selection, and successful reintroduction to native habitats. METHODS AND

resultsWe did not observe any recent genetic bottleneck, and population showed moderate genetic diversity. The estimated effective population size, representing individuals capable of contributing genetically to future generations, was estimated as 18.6 individuals (11.4-35.1 at 95% CI). Based on the genetic make-up and allelic diversity, we found seventeen pangolins (11 females and 6 males) were genetically unrelated and relatively more potent than others.

conclusionIn this study, we evaluated the captive breeding program of the Indian pangolin population at the Pangolin Conservation Breeding Centre in Nandankanan Zoological Park, Bhubaneswar, Odisha. We highlight the significance of genetic monitoring within the captive population of Indian pangolin for preserving genetic diversity and ensuring the long-term survival of the species. We established the genetic profiles of all 29 pangolins and identified 17 pangolins to be prioritized for enhanced breeding and future zoo exchange programs. We appreciate the zoo authorities for promoting genetic assessment of pangolin for better and more effective monitoring of the captive breeding of the endangered Indian pangolin.

Indexed as

BreedingPangolinsAllelesAnimalsEndangered SpeciesFemaleGenetic ProfileHumansMaleCaptive breedingEx-situ conservationGenetic diversityInbreedingIndian pangolin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.