Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38236323›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2024

Performance, feed efficiency, feeding behavior, and cortisol concentration of lambs ranked for Residual Feed Intake and Residual Intake and Gain.

Luiza Vage Coelho Sartori, Danielle Nunes Gurgeira, Charleni Crisóstomo, Claudia Cristina Paro de Paz, Josiel Ferreira, Ricardo Lopes Dias da Costa

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Compilations and updates on residual feed intake in sheep.Tropical animal health and production · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luiza Vage Coelho SartoriCentro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Zootecnia Diversificada, Instituto de Zootecnia, Nova Odessa, SP, 13380011, Brazil.
Danielle Nunes GurgeiraCentro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Zootecnia Diversificada, Instituto de Zootecnia, Nova Odessa, SP, 13380011, Brazil.
Charleni CrisóstomoCentro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura (CENA), Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, 13400970, Brazil.
Claudia Cristina Paro de PazCentro de Pesquisa Pecuária Sustentável, Instituto de Zootecnia, São José do Rio Preto, SP, 15130000, Brazil.
Josiel FerreiraCentro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Zootecnia Diversificada, Instituto de Zootecnia, Nova Odessa, SP, 13380011, Brazil. jjosielborges@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5927-0545
Ricardo Lopes Dias da CostaCentro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Zootecnia Diversificada, Instituto de Zootecnia, Nova Odessa, SP, 13380011, Brazil. rldcosta@sp.gov.br.
Institute of Animal Science and Pastures · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the performance, feed efficiency, feeding behavior, and cortisol concentrations of lambs ranked into different groups of Residual Feed Intake (RFI) and Residual Intake and Gain (RIG). Forty Santa Inês lambs with a mean initial age of 120 ± 30 days and mean initial (IBW) and final body weight (FBW) of 28.9 ± 3.2 and 43.7 ± 3.9 kg, respectively, were used. The animals were fed at an automatic feed and water station (Intergado®) for 60 days and classified at the end of the experiment as low-RFI/RIG, medium-RFI/RIG, and high-RFI/RIG according to RFI and RIG. Performance, feed efficiency measures, ingestive behavior, temperament, and cortisol concentrations were measured, and Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the variables studied. The variables that differed most between RFI groups were dry matter intake, feed conversion, and feed efficiency, with better values in efficient animals (RFI-). Regarding the RGI groups, the average daily gain of animals classified as RIG- was 19.37% lower than that of animals classified as RIG± and 39.28% lower than that of animals classified as RIG+. Only the hourly feeding rate per day (p = 0.04) differed significantly between RFI and RIG classes, while no differences were observed for the ingestive behavior variables or cortisol. The number of visits to the feed bunk (total, with or without intake) showed no correlation with any performance or efficiency measure. Identifying animals ranked into different RFI and RIG classes shows that more efficient animals have a lower feed intake for the same weight gain and spend less time at the feed bunk.

Indexed as

HydrocortisoneSheep, DomesticAnimalsBody WeightEatingFeeding BehaviorSheepHydrocortisoneAnimal selectionBody weightCorrelationCortisolSanta Inês breedWater intake

Identifiers

PMID38236323
OpenAlexW4390974767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.