Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38235967›Full record

ArticleAccountability in research2025

More ethics in the laboratory, please! Scientists' perspectives on ethics in the preclinical phase.

Paola Buedo, Eugenia Prieto, Jolanta Perek-Białas, Idalina Odziemczyk-Stawarz, Marcin Waligora

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accountability in research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paola BuedoResearch Ethics in Medicine Study Group (REMEDY), Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1913-5728
Eugenia PrietoInstituto de Diversidad y Evolución Austral (IDEAus), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Puerto Madryn, Argentina.ORCID 0009-0007-5459-3701
Jolanta Perek-BiałasInstitute of Sociology and Center of Evaluation and Public Policy Analysis, Jagiellonian University, Poland and Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-9565
Idalina Odziemczyk-StawarzDoctoral School in the Social Sciences (Sociological Sciences), Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6752-064X
Marcin WaligoraResearch Ethics in Medicine Study Group (REMEDY), Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1553-1416
Jagiellonian University · PLConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

Training Program in Research Ethics in the AmericasR25TW001605 · FIC · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI LUNA, FLORENCIA · 2000 to 2025
$6.7M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW001605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years there have been calls to improve ethics in preclinical research. Promoting ethics in preclinical research should consider the perspectives of scientists. Our study aims to explore researchers' perspectives on ethics in the preclinical phase. Using interviews and focus groups, we collected views on ethical issues in preclinical research from experienced (

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEthics, ResearchResearch PersonnelFocus GroupsGenetic TherapyHumansInterviews as TopicRegenerative Medicinebioethicsbiomedical researchbiotechnologyintegrityPreclinical research

Identifiers

PMID38235967
PMCPMC11778529
OpenAlexW4390974122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.