Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38235753›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation

Stem Cells and Their Derivatives: Unlocking the Promising Potential of Minimally Manipulated Cells for

Ilya Klabukov, Denis Baranovskii

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilya KlabukovNational Medical Research Radiological Center, Obninsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2888-7999
Denis BaranovskiiNational Medical Research Radiological Center, Obninsk, Russia.
Medical Radiological Research Center · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We've read with great interest the article by Smolinska et al. entitled "Stem Cells and Their Derivatives: An Implication for the Regeneration of Nonunion Fractures" regarding the recent scientific studies dealing with the treatment of nonunion fractures in clinical and preclinical settings using Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC)-based therapeutic techniques. Bone tissue regeneration is a dynamic process that involves the restoration of damaged or lost bone structure and function. Traditional approaches such as autografts and allografts, platelet rich plasma (PRP) treatment and cell therapies, have limitations, including donor site morbidity and immunologic concerns, as well as cell culture and processing requirements. In contrast, the use of minimally manipulated cells that do not require culturing has emerged as a promising alternative that offers several advantages in bone tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationPlatelet-Rich PlasmaBone and BonesBone RegenerationStem CellsTissue EngineeringWound Healingbone regenerationcell cultureregenerative medicinestem cell therapywound healing

Identifiers

PMID38235753
PMCPMC10798098
OpenAlexW4390988248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.