Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38235711›Full record

Trial reportCartilage2024

Management and Amelioration of Knee Joint Osteoarthritis in Adults Using a Novel High-Functional Bovine Collagen Peptide as a Nutritional Therapy: A Double-Blind, Prospective, Multicentric, Randomized, Active and Placebo Controlled, Five-Arm, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability.

Sheena Devasia, Jinu T Joseph, Stephena P S, Seiko Koizumi, Liz Clarke, Sriraam V T, Abhilash Parameswaran Kailas, Shajil Madhavan

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cartilage, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheena DevasiaNitta Gelatin India Limited, Kakkanad, India.
Jinu T JosephNitta Gelatin India Limited, Kakkanad, India.
Stephena P SNitta Gelatin India Limited, Kakkanad, India.
Seiko KoizumiNitta Gelatin Inc., Yao-City, Japan.
Liz ClarkeNitta Gelatin NA, Morrisville, NC, USA.
Sriraam V TAurous Health Care Research and Development India Private Limited, Chennai, India.
Abhilash Parameswaran KailasNitta Gelatin India Limited, Kakkanad, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9918-5065
Shajil MadhavanNitta Gelatin India Limited, Kakkanad, India.
Aurous HealthCare · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe various functionalities of collagen peptides have generated a large interest in utilizing the bioactive peptides as a nutritional therapy to ameliorate various physiological degenerative conditions. Collagen peptides are observed to reduce the pain and aligned difficulties with respect to osteoarthritis. Here we report the enhanced ameliorating property of novel high-functional "Wellnex" Type J collagen peptides following a double-blind randomized active and placebo-controlled 5-arm clinical trial (

designDosages of 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 g of high-functional Type J bovine collagen peptides, 10.0 g of conventional collagen peptides, and 10.0 g of placebo were given to the 5 groups for a period of 90 days. The Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Pain Scale, Quality of Life (QoL), Physician's Impression of change Score (PICS), serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type II collagen (CTX-II) levels and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) parameters were monitored.

resultsType J 2.5 g showed significant improvement in WOMAC, QoL, CTX, and MOAKS and observed to be equivalent to conventional collagen peptide 10-g supplementation in terms of efficacy.

conclusionThe two significant outcomes of the study were that Type J 10.0 g, Type J 5.0 g, Type J 2.5 g and conventional collagen peptides 10.0 g supplementation were observed to be beneficial nutraceutical therapies for knee joint osteoarthritis, and Type J 2.5 g supplementation was equivalent to conventional collagen peptides 10.0-g supplementation in terms of efficacy.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsOsteoarthritis, KneeAdultAgedAnimalsCattleCollagenCollagen Type IIDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPeptidesCollagenCollagen Type IIPeptidesbovine collagen peptideMOAKSosteoarthritisPICsQoLWOMAC

Identifiers

PMID38235711
PMCPMC11520019
OpenAlexW4390975572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.