Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38235567›Full record

ArticleTurk patoloji dergisi2024

A Comprehensive Correlation of Clinicopathologic Prognostic Factors in Malignant Adult Renal Tumors: A Single Institutional Study.

Sobiya M Ayesha, Swetha Sivakumar, Rahul Devraj, Rajsekhar Shantappa, Ranganath Ratnagiri, Meher Lakshmi Konatam, Shantveer G Uppin, Tara Roshni Paul, Megha S Uppin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turk patoloji dergisi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sobiya M AyeshaPathology, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, TELANGANA, INDIA.
Swetha SivakumarPathology, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, TELANGANA, INDIA.
Rahul DevrajUrology, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, TELANGANA, INDIA.
Rajsekhar ShantappaSurgical Oncology, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, TELANGANA, INDIA.
Ranganath RatnagiriSurgical Oncology, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, TELANGANA, INDIA.
Meher Lakshmi KonatamMedical Oncology, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, TELANGANA, INDIA.
Shantveer G UppinPathology, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, TELANGANA, INDIA.
Tara Roshni PaulPathology, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, TELANGANA, INDIA.
Megha S UppinPathology, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, TELANGANA, INDIA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the clinicopathologic prognostic parameters of malignant adult renal tumors as these have poor over-all survival (OS) and show frequent metastasis. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of the clinical and pathologic features of malignant renal tumors in adult patients from January 2011 to December 2020. All the tumors were studied with respect to age, clinical presentation, tumor type/subtype, histologic grade (WHO/ISUP grading system), TNM stage and presence of necrosis. Correlation of histopathologic features and survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox-regression analysis.

resultsA total of 257 cases were included in the study period including 253 renal cell tumors of which clear cell renal cell carcinoma accounted for 69.3%. The age of the patients ranged from 20 to 87 years (median-52 years). The overall survival significantly reduced with increasing histologic grade, stage, and presence of necrosis. The comparison between the histological subtypes was not statistically significant. Univariate Cox-regression analysis found significant hazard ratio with increasing age, size, histologic grade (G4 vs G1), stage, and presence of necrosis. The correlation of OS with histological subtypes was not significant. Multivariate analysis also showed increased hazard ratio with increasing age, size, grade, and stage. However, the P-value was significant only for age.

conclusionClear cell renal cell carcinoma was the commonest type of adult renal tumor. Older age at presentation, larger tumor size, presence of necrosis, and higher histologic grade and stage were associated with poor prognosis in these patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMiddle AgedNecrosisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38235567
PMCPMC11129866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.