Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38235525›Full record

ArticleStatistical applications in genetics and molecular biology2024

Bayesian LASSO for population stratification correction in rare haplotype association studies.

Zilu Liu, Asuman Seda Turkmen, Shili Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zilu LiuDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2387-3587
Asuman Seda TurkmenDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Shili LinDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Funding

Omics analysis of three-dimensional transcriptional regulationR01GM114142 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI JIN, VICTOR, LIN, SHILI · 2015 to 2024
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population stratification (PS) is one major source of confounding in both single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and haplotype association studies. To address PS, principal component regression (PCR) and linear mixed model (LMM) are the current standards for SNP associations, which are also commonly borrowed for haplotype studies. However, the underfitting and overfitting problems introduced by PCR and LMM, respectively, have yet to be addressed. Furthermore, there have been only a few theoretical approaches proposed to address PS specifically for haplotypes. In this paper, we propose a new method under the Bayesian LASSO framework, QBLstrat, to account for PS in identifying rare and common haplotypes associated with a continuous trait of interest. QBLstrat utilizes a large number of principal components (PCs) with appropriate priors to sufficiently correct for PS, while shrinking the estimates of unassociated haplotypes and PCs. We compare the performance of QBLstrat with the Bayesian counterparts of PCR and LMM and a current method, haplo.stats. Extensive simulation studies and real data analyses show that QBLstrat is superior in controlling false positives while maintaining competitive power for identifying true positives under PS.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBayes TheoremGenome-Wide Association StudyHaplotypesPhenotypeBayesian LASSOgenetic association studyhaplotypepopulation stratificationspurious association

Identifiers

PMID38235525
PMCPMC10794901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.