Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38235478›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroergonomics2022

Dual Passive Reactive Brain-Computer Interface: A Novel Approach to Human-Machine Symbiosis.

Frédéric Dehais, Simon Ladouce, Ludovic Darmet, Tran-Vu Nong, Giuseppe Ferraro, Juan Torre Tresols, Sébastien Velut, Patrice Labedan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Prospects and technical challenges of non-invasive brain-computer interfaces in manned space missions].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Frequency tagging of spatial attention using periliminal flickers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Frédéric DehaisArtificial and Natural Intelligence Toulouse Institute, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Simon LadouceDepartment for Aerospace Vehicles Design and Control, ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Ludovic DarmetDepartment for Aerospace Vehicles Design and Control, ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Tran-Vu NongDepartment for Aerospace Vehicles Design and Control, ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Giuseppe FerraroDepartment for Aerospace Vehicles Design and Control, ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Juan Torre TresolsDepartment for Aerospace Vehicles Design and Control, ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Sébastien VelutDepartment for Aerospace Vehicles Design and Control, ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Patrice LabedanDepartment for Aerospace Vehicles Design and Control, ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRInstitut Superieur de l'Aeronautique et de l'Espace (ISAE-SUPAERO) · FRDrexel University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study proposes a novel concept of neuroadaptive technology, namely a dual passive-reactive Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), that enables bi-directional interaction between humans and machines. We have implemented such a system in a realistic flight simulator using the NextMind classification algorithms and framework to decode pilots' intention (reactive BCI) and to infer their level of attention (passive BCI). Twelve pilots used the reactive BCI to perform checklists along with an anti-collision radar monitoring task that was supervised by the passive BCI. The latter simulated an automatic avoidance maneuver when it detected that pilots missed an incoming collision. The reactive BCI reached 100% classification accuracy with a mean reaction time of 1.6 s when exclusively performing the checklist task. Accuracy was up to 98.5% with a mean reaction time of 2.5 s when pilots also had to fly the aircraft and monitor the anti-collision radar. The passive BCI achieved a

Indexed as

electroencephalographyflight simulatorpassive and reactive Brain Computer Interfaceuser experienceVisual Evoked Potential (VEP)

Identifiers

PMID38235478
PMCPMC10790872
OpenAlexW4226145720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.