Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38235470›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroergonomics2022

Modeling the acceptability of BCIs for motor rehabilitation after stroke: A large scale study on the general public.

Elise Grevet, Killyam Forge, Sebastien Tadiello, Margaux Izac, Franck Amadieu, Lionel Brunel, Léa Pillette, Jacques Py, David Gasq, Camille Jeunet-Kelway

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Brain-Computer Interfaces for Stroke Motor Rehabilitation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elise GrevetCNRS, EPHE, INCIA, UMR5287, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Killyam ForgeCLLE, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
Sebastien TadielloCNRS, EPHE, INCIA, UMR5287, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Margaux IzacCNRS, EPHE, INCIA, UMR5287, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Franck AmadieuCLLE, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
Lionel BrunelUniversité Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPSYLON EA 4556, Montpellier, France.
Léa PilletteCNRS, EPHE, INCIA, UMR5287, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Jacques PyCLLE, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
David GasqToNIC, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, Toulouse, France.
Camille Jeunet-KelwayCNRS, EPHE, INCIA, UMR5287, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Strokes leave around 40% of survivors dependent in their activities of daily living, notably due to severe motor disabilities. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been shown to be efficiency for improving motor recovery after stroke, but this efficiency is still far from the level required to achieve the clinical breakthrough expected by both clinicians and patients. While technical levers of improvement have been identified (e.g., sensors and signal processing), fully optimized BCIs are pointless if patients and clinicians cannot or do not want to use them. We hypothesize that improving BCI acceptability will reduce patients' anxiety levels, while increasing their motivation and engagement in the procedure, thereby favoring learning, ultimately, and motor recovery. In other terms, acceptability could be used as a lever to improve BCI efficiency. Yet, studies on BCI based on acceptability/acceptance literature are missing. Thus, our goal was to model BCI acceptability in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke, and to identify its determinants. Methods: The main outcomes of this paper are the following: i) we designed the first model of acceptability of BCIs for motor rehabilitation after stroke, ii) we created a questionnaire to assess acceptability based on that model and distributed it on a sample representative of the general public in France ( Results: Results show that BCIs are associated with high levels of acceptability in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke and that the intention to use them in that context is mainly driven by the Discussion: With this paper we propose a basis (model) and a methodology that could be adapted in the future in order to study and compare the results obtained with: i) different stakeholders, i.e., patients and caregivers; ii) different populations of different cultures around the world; and iii) different targets, i.e., other clinical and non-clinical BCI applications.

Indexed as

acceptabilityacceptancebrain-computer interface (BCI)modelmotor rehabilitationneurofeedback (NF)questionnairestroke

Identifiers

PMID38235470
PMCPMC10790937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.