Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38235397›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2024

Combined Single-Shot Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee and Adductor Canal Block With Bupivacaine, Dexmedetomidine, and Dexamethasone for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Melina Shoni, Aneesh V Samineni, Seroos Salavati, Nikhil Mikkilineni, Allen Wang, Ayesha Abdeen, David Freccero

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07526831 (Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Combined With Local Anesthetic Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Knee), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07526831 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Combined With Local Anesthetic Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) in Patients Undergoing Knee Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorTC Erciyes UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsKnee Arthroplasty, TotalArmsAdductor Canal Block Group (Group I), Adductor Canal + iPACK Block Group (Group II)"
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melina ShoniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Aneesh V SamineniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.
Seroos SalavatiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Nikhil MikkilineniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Allen WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Ayesha AbdeenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
David FrecceroDepartment of Orthopaedics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston Medical Center · USUniversity of Miami Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To investigate if combined single-shot adductor canal blockade (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) provide better postoperative pain management compared to ACB alone for patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent primary, unilateral TKA. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts: single-shot ACB alone (performed with bupivacaine 0.25%) and combined single-shot ACB + IPACK (performed with bupivacaine 0.25%, dexmedetomidine 1 mg/kg, and dexamethasone 4 mg). Patients were propensity-matched 1:1. The primary study outcome was total opioid consumption converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per eight-hour interval and postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, length of stay, ambulation distance, return to emergency department, hospital readmission, and 30-day adverse events. Results: One hundred eighty patients were identified, of which propensity matching used 71% to yield 64 patients receiving ACB alone and 64 receiving combined ACB + IPACK. Combined ACB + IPACK had significantly lower total summative MME throughout the entire postoperative stay ( Conclusions: Combined single-shot ACB + IPACK block was associated with lower total narcotic intake and mean pain scores during most of the immediate postoperative period following primary, unilateral TKA compared to ACB alone. Implementing longer-acting, single-shot ACB + IPACK for TKA can balance effective and more selective pain management with early rehabilitation.

Indexed as

ACBIPACKPostoperative pain managementRegional anesthesiaTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID38235397
PMCPMC10792166
OpenAlexW4390363258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.