Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38235300›Full record

ArticleHealth systems (Basingstoke, England)2023

From digital health to learning health systems: four approaches to using data for digital health design.

Valeria Pannunzio, Maaike Kleinsmann, Dirk Snelders, Jeroen Raijmakers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health systems (Basingstoke, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valeria PannunzioDepartment of Design, Organization and Strategy, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9074-4139
Maaike KleinsmannDepartment of Design, Organization and Strategy, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-5048
Dirk SneldersDepartment of Design, Organization and Strategy, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6678-9281
Jeroen RaijmakersDepartment of Design, Organization and Strategy, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0042-7472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health technologies, powered by digital data, provide an opportunity to improve the efficacy and efficiency of health systems at large. However, little is known about different approaches to the use of data for digital health design, or about their possible relations to system-level dynamics. In this contribution, we identify four existing approaches to the use of data for digital health design, namely the silent, the overt, the data-enabled, and the convergent. After characterising the approaches, we provide real-life examples of each. Furthermore, we compare the approaches in terms of selected desirable characteristics of the design process, highlighting relative advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we reflect on the system-level relevance of the differentiation between the approaches and point towards future research directions. Overall, the contribution provides researchers and practitioners with a broad conceptual framework to examine data-related challenges and opportunities in digital health design.

Indexed as

clinical systems and Informaticsdecision support systems, data mining & data analyticsHealthcare design science

Identifiers

PMID38235300
PMCPMC10791080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.