Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38235012›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion perspectives2023

Strengthening social capital in the Sri Lankan population: A qualitative exploration of factors driving the mothers' support groups initiative during economic crisis.

Millawage Supun Dilara Wijesinghe, Upeksha Gayani Karawita, Nissanka Achchi Kankanamalage Ayoma Iroshanee Nissanka, Balangoda Muhamdiramlage Indika Gunawardana, Weerasinghe Mudiyanselage Prasad Chathuranga Weerasinghe, Vithanage Chandima Nayani Vithana, Kanchana Lanka Kumari Mahagamage, Singappuli Arachchilage Sanjeewanie Champika Karunaratne, Ranjith Batuwanthudawe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion perspectives, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Millawage Supun Dilara WijesingheHealth Promotion Bureau, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8417-0098
Upeksha Gayani KarawitaHealth Promotion Bureau, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2648-5944
Nissanka Achchi Kankanamalage Ayoma Iroshanee NissankaHealth Promotion Bureau, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9271-990X
Balangoda Muhamdiramlage Indika GunawardanaHealth Promotion Bureau, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3609-3651
Weerasinghe Mudiyanselage Prasad Chathuranga WeerasingheHealth Promotion Bureau, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-0911
Vithanage Chandima Nayani VithanaHealth Promotion Bureau, Sri Lanka.
Kanchana Lanka Kumari MahagamageHealth Promotion Bureau, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7563-0870
Singappuli Arachchilage Sanjeewanie Champika KarunaratneHealth Promotion Bureau, Sri Lanka.
Ranjith BatuwanthudaweHealth Promotion Bureau, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5918-2791
Thai Health Promotion Foundation · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social capital is a concept that has been identified to improve health outcomes in many populations. Due to COVID-19 and many other factors, Sri Lanka faced a massive economic crisis that affected the nutrition of communities. Many community engagement initiatives have begun to promote the country's nutrition during the worst-hit years. The Mothers' Support Groups initiative is one of the existing community engagement initiatives that is well known for strengthening community social capital. This article discusses how the Mothers' Support Groups (MSG) initiative in Sri Lanka contributed to improving social capital in Sri Lanka during the economic crisis, focusing on nutrition. Methods: We conducted a case study on the activities undertaken by mothers' support groups in view of how they focused on social capital. We selected all activities presented by districts that improved social capital related to nutrition promotion captured in the YouTube video stream. We analyzed these qualitative data to identify the main themes related to social capital and nutritional promotion. Two coders transcribed the video recordings. We analyzed the data using the iterative thematic inquiry (ITI) method and initially assessed beliefs about concepts, building new beliefs through encounters with data, listing tentative themes, and evaluating themes through coding. Results: Six major themes were identified (that social capital had been strengthened to promote nutrition): awareness creation of nutrition, home gardening promotion, promoting livestock farming, minimizing food waste, improving the home economy, and psychosocial health promotion. The most common forms of social capital encountered in these themes were bonding, bridging, and linking. Furthermore, strengthening structural social capital is more prominent than strengthening cognitive social capital. Conclusion: Social capital can improve nutritional status during crises. Activities that can be used to achieve this vary from simple awareness creation among communities to more advanced psychosocial health promotion. Overall, social capital contributed to the community development aspect of health promotion to a greater extent.

Indexed as

Community participationNutritional statusSocial capital

Identifiers

PMID38235012
PMCPMC10790123
OpenAlexW4390988777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.