Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38234977›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Factor analysis for construct validity of a trunk impairment scale in Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional study.

Kazunori Sato, Yuta Yamazaki, Yoshihiro Kameyama, Koji Watanabe, Eriko Kitahara, Koshiro Haruyama, Yoko Takahashi, Yuji Fujino, Tomofumi Yamaguchi, Tadamitsu Matsuda and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Kazunori SatoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta YamazakiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro KameyamaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji WatanabeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Eriko KitaharaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koshiro HaruyamaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoko TakahashiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji FujinoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomofumi YamaguchiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadamitsu MatsudaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitoshi MakabeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Reina IsayamaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuhei MurakamiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mami TaniDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaoru HonagaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kozo HatoriDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka OjiDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji TomizawaDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Taku HatanoDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobutaka HattoriDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiyuki FujiwaraDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the construct validity of the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), which was developed to assess trunk impairment in patients with stroke, in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Design: This retrospective, cross-sectional study enrolled consecutive PD inpatients. Correlation analysis was performed to clarify whether the TIS assessment was related to other balance functions, lower extremity muscle strength, or walking ability. Factor analysis was performed to see how the background factors of TIS differ from balance function, lower limb muscle strength, and walking ability. Results: Examining the data of 471 patients with PD, there were relationships between TIS and the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test ( Conclusion: The TIS can be useful for assessing the underlying trunk impairment as a basis for activities of daily living, gait function, and balance ability in patients with PD.

Indexed as

factor analysisParkinson’s diseasephysical therapyrehabilitationtrunk impairment

Identifiers

PMID38234977
PMCPMC10791816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.