ReviewCureus2023
Non-surgical Rhinoplasty (NSR): A Systematic Review of Its Techniques, Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ipsilateral vs. Contralateral Pedicle in Expanded Forehead Flap for Alar Necrosis: Which is Better?Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Standardized Non-surgical Rhinoplasty with Hyaluronic Acid: Consistent Outcomes Across Injectors with Varying Experience.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Polycaprolactone Filler in Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: A Pilot Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty After Nasal Skin Cancer Reconstruction: Enhancing Esthetic Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: Results from a Retrospective Study of Rino-4-Puntos Technique with Hyaluronic Acid.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty by Cartilage Allograft.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Rhinomodelation With Polycarpolactone-A Safer and Effective Solution for the Future.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Reduction of surgical-site infections and improvement of scar parameters with a uniform fractional ultra-pulse CO₂ laser protocol in cosmetic surgery: a five-center retrospective cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Functional, Cosmetic, and Psychological Outcomes after Rhinoplasty.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Sling-bridge technique: new technique in extracorporeal septorhinoplasty.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Tip up - Simplified technique for non-surgical rhinoplasty: A case series.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical rhinoplasty (SR), commonly known as nose job, is a widely practiced cosmetic surgery globally, aimed at addressing diverse aesthetic and functional concerns related to the nose. In recent years, non-surgical rhinoplasty (NSR) has gained popularity due to advanced techniques involving hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers, offering advantages such as affordability, reduced side effects, and faster results. However, concerns persist about the suitability of dermal fillers for nasal anatomy and potential complications, prompting this comprehensive review. This study systematically evaluated the techniques, fillers, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with NSR, with the intent of providing valuable insights for clinicians and patients considering NSR or SR for improved aesthetic outcomes. The literature search, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria, yielded 16 relevant studies from an initial pool of 1002 articles. These studies covered various aspects of NSR, including techniques, complications, limitations, and positive results. In conclusion, NSR appears to be a quick and safe option for addressing minor nose shape issues, particularly through the use of HA fillers, but further discussion and standardization are necessary to address risks and limitations. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) using photographic evidence could significantly propel the progress of this evolving treatment. RCTs offer an optimal method to assess NSR's adverse effects and overall outcomes by allowing controlled comparisons between treatment and control groups. This approach minimizes biases and generates reliable statistical data, which is critical for evaluating safety, efficacy, and potential risks, thereby guiding informed clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.