Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38234802›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Rare Disease Concept Normalization.

Andy Wang, Cong Liu, Jingye Yang, Chunhua Weng

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andy WangPeddie School, Hightstown, NJ, USA.
Cong LiuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Jingye YangDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Chunhua WengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

RESCUE: Rare Disease Detection and Escalation Support via a Learning Health SystemR01HG012655 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Cong Liu · 2022 to 2026
$4.1M
Fair Phenotype Annotation and Genomic ReinterpretationR01HG013031 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Wendy K Chung, CHUNHUA WENG · 2023 to 2026
$3.5M
Deep phenotyping in Electronic Health Records for Genomic MedicineR01LM012895 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, KAI, WENG, CHUNHUA · 2018 to 2021
$3.3M
Deep learning based predictive analytics to improve patient health.R01LM013061 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Krzysztof Kiryluk, CHUNHUA WENG · 2019 to 2026
$2.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012655NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG013031NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012895NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aim to develop a novel method for rare disease concept normalization by fine-tuning Llama 2, an open-source large language model (LLM), using a domain-specific corpus sourced from the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO). Methods: We developed an in-house template-based script to generate two corpora for fine-tuning. The first (NAME) contains standardized HPO names, sourced from the HPO vocabularies, along with their corresponding identifiers. The second (NAME+SYN) includes HPO names and half of the concept's synonyms as well as identifiers. Subsequently, we fine-tuned Llama2 (Llama2-7B) for each sentence set and conducted an evaluation using a range of sentence prompts and various phenotype terms. Results: When the phenotype terms for normalization were included in the fine-tuning corpora, both models demonstrated nearly perfect performance, averaging over 99% accuracy. In comparison, ChatGPT-3.5 has only ~20% accuracy in identifying HPO IDs for phenotype terms. When single-character typos were introduced in the phenotype terms, the accuracy of NAME and NAME+SYN is 10.2% and 36.1%, respectively, but increases to 61.8% (NAME+SYN) with additional typo-specific fine-tuning. For terms sourced from HPO vocabularies as unseen synonyms, the NAME model achieved 11.2% accuracy, while the NAME+SYN model achieved 92.7% accuracy. Conclusion: Our fine-tuned models demonstrate ability to normalize phenotype terms unseen in the fine-tuning corpus, including misspellings, synonyms, terms from other ontologies, and laymen's terms. Our approach provides a solution for the use of LLM to identify named medical entities from the clinical narratives, while successfully normalizing them to standard concepts in a controlled vocabulary.

Indexed as

concept normalizationfine-tuningHPOLarge language modelLlama2

Identifiers

PMID38234802
PMCPMC10793431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.