Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38234715›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Neural circuit models for evidence accumulation through choice-selective sequences.

Lindsey S Brown, Jounhong Ryan Cho, Scott S Bolkan, Edward H Nieh, Manuel Schottdorf, David W Tank, Carlos D Brody, Ilana B Witten, Mark S Goldman

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jounhong Ryan Cho
Scott S Bolkan
Edward H Nieh
Manuel Schottdorf
David W Tank
Carlos D Brody
Ilana B Witten
Mark S Goldman

Funding

Characterizing the underlying population code to understand the functional organization of the hippocampus and the lateral hypothalamusR00DA053388 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI NIEH, HORNG-AN EDWARD · 2023 to 2025
$747k
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA053388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision making is traditionally thought to be mediated by neurons that accumulate evidence through persistent activity. However, recent decision-making experiments in rodents have observed neurons across the brain that fire sequentially, rather than persistently, with the subset of neurons in the sequence depending on the animal's choice. We developed two new candidate circuit models in which neurons are active sequentially and transfer evidence faithfully to the next active population. One model encodes evidence in the relative firing of two competing chains of neurons, and the other in the network location of a stereotyped pattern ("bump") of neural activity. Neural recordings from four brain regions during an evidence accumulation task revealed that different regions displayed evidence tuning consistent with different candidate models. This work provides a mechanistic explanation for how graded information may be precisely accumulated within and transferred between neural populations, and suggests that different brain regions may accumulate evidence through different circuit mechanisms.

Identifiers

PMID38234715
PMCPMC10793437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.