Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38234679›Full record

ArticleRegenerative therapy2024

Long term improvement of knee osteoarthritis after injection of single high/very high volume of very pure PRP: A retrospective analysis of patients optimally managed in dedicated centers.

Didier Prost, Thomas Bardot, Alexandre Baud, Anthony Calvo, Stephane Aumont, Herve Collado, Julien Borne, Olivier Rajon, Antoine Ponsot, Alexandra Malaterre and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Injection therapy in professional footballers.International orthopaedics · 2024
    Review
  11. Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Pain: A Scoping Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Didier ProstRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Thomas BardotRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Alexandre BaudRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Anthony CalvoRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Stephane AumontRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Herve ColladoRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Julien BorneRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Lyon, France.
Olivier RajonRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Lyon, France.
Antoine PonsotRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Lyon, France.
Alexandra MalaterreRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Yannis DahakRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Guy MagalonRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Florence SabatierRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Jeremy MagalonRegenerative Medicine Department of Excellence, Marseille, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: PRP is gaining increasing interest for pain relief and improvement of joint function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) but practices and results remain heterogeneous limiting its adoption as standard of care. Current international recommendations are to collect real-life evidence of efficacy with a systematic monitoring of PRP quality and patients' outcomes. We aimed to analyze the response of patients presenting KOA and treated with standardized PRP injection in routine care. We also investigated the potential contributing factors including patient's phenotype and PRP characteristics. Methods: Patients with symptomatic KOA and that failed first-line therapy received a single injection of a qualified PRP prepared using medical devices allowing to recover a high/very high volume of very pure PRP. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were recorded at baseline and during 18 months follow-up. Results: 431 patients had available follow-up data at 3 months, 291 at 6 months, 137 at 12 months and 44 at 18 months. PRP induced a significant decrease of WOMAC score at all follow up endpoints (29.2 ± 19.2 at 3 months, p < 0.001 and 25.9 ± 19.7 at 12 months, p < 0.01, compared to 39.7 ± 18.9 at baseline). Similar results were observed for pain VAS (38.9 ± 23.3 at 3 months, p < 0.001 and 35.3 ± 24.1 at 12 months, p < 0.05, compared to 56.0 ± 20.7 at baseline). Changes at 12 months were correlated to baseline scores and to the level of improvement at 3 months. The proportion of OMERACT OARSI responders reached 56.2 % for the total cohort and 60.4 % for severe patients at 6 months. Treatment failure occurred for 8.4 % of patients. Age, BMI or Kellgren-Lawrence grade did not impact on efficacy. Conclusion: This real-life study evidences the clinical benefit of a standardized high or very high-volume injection of very pure PRP in patients with KOA, including those with a severe grade. It opens perspectives in the positioning of such strategy to delay arthroplasty and provide insights on factors able to anticipate long term efficacy.

Indexed as

Knee osteoarthritisPRPQuality controlReal world evidence

Identifiers

PMID38234679
PMCPMC10792744
OpenAlexW4390522047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.