ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2024
Relationship between the lymphocyte to C‑reactive protein ratio and coronary artery disease severity.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on nutritional status and incidence of sarcopenia in elderly patients with chronic heart failure.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of MHR, PLR Combined With NLRP1 for Severity and Long-Term Prognosis in Premature Coronary Artery Disease.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Article
- Association Between Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Indices and Severity of Coronary Artery Lesions in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in Different Glucose Metabolic States.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Prognostic Role of Inflammatory Hematologic Indices in Predicting Acute Coronary Syndrome in Elderly Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular risk in patients with gastrointestinal angiodysplasia: the role of aortic stiffness and non-dipper blood pressure patterns; predictive value of novel inflammatory biomarkers.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of Thrombolytic Therapy on Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Cureus · 2024Article
- Lymphocyte to C-reactive protein ratio is associated with in-hospital cardiac death in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary atherosclerosis is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease. Laboratory parameters such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) have been used to assess inflammation degree and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity. The lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) is a new SII. However, its relationship with CAD development and severity is unclear. A total of 1,107 patients (479 in control group, 628 in CAD group) underwent coronary angiography. The routine and biochemical indices of the venous blood of patients were assessed before coronary angiography. LCR, SII, NLR and PLR were calculated and statistical analyses were performed. Propensity score matching (PSM) and a logistic regression model were used to analyze the relationship between LCR and CAD. After the PSM, 384 pairs of patients with or without CAD were successfully matched. After the median binary classification of all indicators, uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that platelet count was an independent risk factor and LCR was an independent protective factor. Using the same method, in the coronary heart disease severity group, 212 pairs were successfully matched and NLR and PLR were independent risk factors, while LCR was an independent protective factor. In conclusion, LCR is an independent protective factor against CAD development and severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.