ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Correlation dimension and entropy in the assessment of sex differences based on human gait data.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Gait Nonlinearities in Individuals Without Known Pathology Describe Metabolic Cost During Walking Using Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Linear Regression.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: It is proved that there are differences between gait performed by females and males, which appear in movements of selected body parts. Despite numerous state-of-the-art studies related to the discriminative analysis of motion capture data, the question of whether measures of signal complexity and uncertainty can extract valuable features for the problem of sex distinction still remains open. It is the subject of the paper. Methods: Correlation dimension, as well as approximate and sample entropies, are selected to describe motion data. In the numerical experiments, the collected dataset with 884 samples of 25 females and 30 males was used. The measurements took place in the Human Motion Laboratory (HML), equipped with a highly precise motion capture system. Two variants of data representation were investigated-time series that contain joint rotations of taken skeleton model as well as positions of the markers attached to the human body. Finally, a comparative analysis between the populations of females and males using descriptive statistics, non-parametric estimation, and statistical hypotheses verification was carried out. Results: There are statistically significant sex differences extracted by the taken measures. In general, the movements of lower limbs result in greater values of correlation dimension and entropies for females, while selected upper body parts play a similar role for males. The dissimilarities are mainly observed in hip, ankle, shoulder, and head movements. Discussion: Correlation dimension and entropy measures provide robust and explainable features of motion capture data with a valuable description of the human locomotion system. Thus, beyond the importance of discovered differences between females and males, their interpretation and understanding are also known.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.