Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38234592›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

Sensory temporal sampling in time: an integrated model of the TSF and neural noise hypothesis as an etiological pathway for dyslexia.

Oliver H M Lasnick, Fumiko Hoeft

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Translating the Power of Precision Medicine Into the World of Communication Disorders.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oliver H M LasnickbrainLENS Laboratory, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Fumiko HoeftbrainLENS Laboratory, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms Underlying Compensation in DyslexiaR01HD096261 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI HOEFT, FUMIKO · 2018 to 2023
$3.4M
Intergenerational Neuroimaging of Language and Reading Networks Using a Natural Cross-Fostering DesignR01HD094834 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI HOEFT, FUMIKO · 2019 to 2024
$3.4M
Network to Advance the Study of Mechanisms Underlying Mind-Body Interventions and Measurement of Emotional WellbeingU24AT011281 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI CHAFOULEAS, SANDRA M, HOEFT, FUMIKO · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
Training in the Cognitive Neuroscience of CommunicationT32DC017703 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI Inge-Marie Eigsti, Emily B Myers · 2019 to 2026
$2.3M
Using Genetic Similarity Quantified by Kinship Coefficients to Investigate Familial Contributions to Reading DisorderF31HD107944 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI LASNICK, OLIVER H.M. · 2022 to 2023
$83k
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT011281NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD107944NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094834NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD096261NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC017703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much progress has been made in research on the causal mechanisms of developmental dyslexia. In recent years, the "temporal sampling" account of dyslexia has evolved considerably, with contributions from neurogenetics and novel imaging methods resulting in a much more complex etiological view of the disorder. The original temporal sampling framework implicates disrupted neural entrainment to speech as a causal factor for atypical phonological representations. Yet, empirical findings have not provided clear evidence of a low-level etiology for this endophenotype. In contrast, the neural noise hypothesis presents a theoretical view of the manifestation of dyslexia from the level of genes to behavior. However, its relative novelty (published in 2017) means that empirical research focused on specific predictions is sparse. The current paper reviews dyslexia research using a dual framework from the temporal sampling and neural noise hypotheses and discusses the complementary nature of these two views of dyslexia. We present an argument for an integrated model of sensory temporal sampling as an etiological pathway for dyslexia. Finally, we conclude with a brief discussion of outstanding questions.

Indexed as

developmental dyslexiaentrainmentneural noise hypothesisneural oscillationsreading disordertemporal samplingTSF

Identifiers

PMID38234592
PMCPMC10792016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.