ReviewInfection and drug resistance2024
A Systematic Review of the Microbial Landscape of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Uganda.
Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Critical Review of Clinical Evidence, Health-System Feasibility and Public Health Implications.International wound journal · 2026Review
- Phylogenetic Profiling of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Microbiome of an Afro-Caribbean Population.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial resistance profiles and detection of mecA, blaCTX-M-1, and blaSHV genes in bacteria among diabetic foot ulcer patients from selected referral hospitals in Uganda.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Whole genome sequence of a virulent and multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain MD02 isolated from a diabetic foot ulcer in Uganda.BMC genomic data · 2025Article
- Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025Article
- Whole genome sequence data ofData in brief · 2025Article
- Sequence analysis of microbiota in clinical human cases with diabetic foot ulcers from China.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes is a growing health concern globally. Poorly managed diabetes may result in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), which can become a source of chronic infection known as diabetic foot infections. The increasing trend of diabetes in Uganda speaks to the potential for diabetic foot ulcers which may eventually become infected and their attendant impact on the quality of life of diabetic patients. This review assesses the microbial diversity of DFUs in Uganda, aiming to guide treatment and identify research gaps. Main Body of the Abstract: We searched PubMed, Scopus and Embase for studies conducted in Uganda that reported isolating microorganisms from diabetic foot ulcers. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA), we included two eligible studies that reported isolating 122 bacteria spread across eleven (11) species using swab samples and conventional culture methods. Significant isolates included World Health Organization priority pathogens including: Short Conclusion: We conclude that data on the microbiology of DFUs in Uganda is scarce; however, the bioburden of DFUs in the country is similar to those in other parts of the world, and MRSA poses a challenge to antibiotic therapy. Consequently, the continued use of swab samples and conventional culture and sensitivity methods may limit the isolation, identification, and presentation of other important isolates. We recommend characterization of bacterial isolates to better understand their genetic makeup, and the development of a national guideline for managing diabetic foot infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.