Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38234328›Full record

ReviewCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2023

The pressure reactivity index as a measure of cerebral autoregulation and its application in traumatic brain injury management.

Zac A Tsigaras, Mark Weeden, Robert McNamara, Toby Jeffcote, Andrew A Udy, PRECISION-TBI Investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06601842 (Monitoring and Optimization of Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Post-cardiac Arrest Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06601842 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Monitoring and Optimization of Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsCardiac ArrestArmsICP monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Computed tomography-derived KNeuroradiology · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zac A TsigarasThe Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Mark WeedenSt George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia.
Robert McNamaraDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA 6001, Australia.
Toby JeffcoteThe Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Andrew A UdyThe Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
PRECISION-TBI Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines advocate for the maintenance of a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) between 60 and 70 mmHg following severe TBI. However, such a uniform goal does not account for changes in cerebral autoregulation (CA). CA refers to the complex homeostatic mechanisms by which cerebral blood flow is maintained, despite variations in mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure. Disruption to CA has become increasingly recognised as a key mediator of secondary brain injury following severe TBI. The pressure reactivity index is calculated as the degree of statistical correlation between the slow wave components of mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure signals and is a validated dynamic marker of CA status following brain injury. The widespread acceptance of pressure reactivity index has precipitated the consideration of individualised CPP targets or an optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt). CPPopt represents an alternative target for cerebral haemodynamic optimisation following severe TBI, and early observational data suggest improved neurological outcomes in patients whose CPP is more proximate to CPPopt. The recent publication of a prospective randomised feasibility study of CPPopt guided therapy in TBI, suggests clinicians caring for such patients should be increasingly familiar with these concepts. In this paper, we present a narrative review of the key landmarks in the development of CPPopt and offer a summary of the evidence for CPPopt-based therapy in comparison to current standards of care.

Indexed as

Anaesthesia and Intensive CareIntensive CareTraumaTrauma care deliveryTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID38234328
PMCPMC10790019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.