Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38234320›Full record

ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2023

Perceptions of intensive care triage in Australia and New Zealand in 2009 and 2023.

William B Blackburne, Paul J Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Mean arterial pressure targets in intensive care unit patients receiving noradrenaline: An international survey.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

William B BlackburneIntensive Care Unit, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
Paul J YoungIntensive Care Unit, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Intensive care (ICU) beds are scarce and decision-making regarding admission is complex and multi-factorial. This study aimed to characterise differences in admission decision making between Australia and New Zealand and compare to previous data to establish changes over time. Design: Online Survey. Setting and Participants: An online survey was distributed to Australian and New Zealand intensive care doctors measuring triage behaviours in the last week and responses to ICU triage scenarios. Main Outcome Measures: Perceived ICU admission behaviours. Results: 103 responses were obtained, 83(80.6%) from Australia and 97 (94.2%) from specialist intensivists. The median number of triage decisions and patients declined were 6-10 and 1-5 respectively. No difference was noted in the role of ICU bed capacity in decision making between Australia and New Zealand. Compared to Australian intensivists, New Zealand intensivists were less likely to admit a patient: with relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)(p=0.03), with persistent vegetative state and community acquired (p=0.02) or iatrogenic (p=0.03) pneumonia. Compared to respondents in 2009 (n=238), 2023 respondents were more likely to admit a patient: with a severe intracranial bleed who may become braindead (p=0.005), with relapsed AML and ARDS (p=0.02), with stroke for palliative care (p<0.001); and less likely to admit a patient with persistent vegetative state and iatrogenic pneumonia (p=0.03). In a multivariable analysis, respondents from Australian compared to New Zealand and from 2023 compared to 2009 were more likely to indicate they would admit patients to the ICU in the scenarios described (p<0.001 for both comparisons). Conclusions: Our study suggests that New Zealand intensivists may apply more restrictive ICU admission criteria than Australian intensivists. Changes in attitudes to admission since 2009 may reflect increased awareness of the importance of facilitating organ donation and the role of ICU as providers of palliative care.

Indexed as

AdmissionsAnaesthesia and intensive careHealthcare resourcesIntensive care

Identifiers

PMID38234320
PMCPMC10790017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.