Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38234256›Full record

ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2024

Fast and accurate excited states predictions: machine learning and diabatization.

Štěpán Sršeň, O Anatole von Lilienfeld, Petr Slavíček

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Štěpán SršeňDepartment of Physical Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 162 28 Prague, Czech Republic. stepan.srsen@vscht.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7723-4540
O Anatole von LilienfeldVector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, ON, M5S 1M1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7419-0466
Petr SlavíčekDepartment of Physical Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 162 28 Prague, Czech Republic. stepan.srsen@vscht.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-5538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficiency of machine learning algorithms for electronically excited states is far behind ground-state applications. One of the underlying problems is the insufficient smoothness of the fitted potential energy surfaces and other properties in the vicinity of state crossings and conical intersections, which is a prerequisite for an efficient regression. Smooth surfaces can be obtained by switching to the diabatic basis. However, diabatization itself is still an outstanding problem. We overcome these limitations by solving both problems at once. We use a machine learning approach combining clustering and regression techniques to correct for the deficiencies of property-based diabatization which, in return, provides us with smooth surfaces that can be easily fitted. Our approach extends the applicability of property-based diabatization to multidimensional systems. We utilize the proposed diabatization scheme to achieve higher prediction accuracy for adiabatic states and we show its performance by reconstructing global potential energy surfaces of excited states of nitrosyl fluoride and formaldehyde. While the proposed methodology is independent of the specific property-based diabatization and regression algorithm, we show its performance for kernel ridge regression and a very simple diabatization based on transition multipoles. Compared to most other algorithms based on machine learning, our approach needs only a small amount of training data.

Identifiers

PMID38234256
PMCPMC10829538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.