Observational studyUnited European gastroenterology journal2024
Incidence, characteristics, and predictive factors of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.
Observational study in United European gastroenterology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sociodemographic and Clinical Predictors of Colonoscopy Utilization in Oman: A Call to Action within a Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- AI-Enhanced Prognostic Model for Predicting Polyp Recurrence and Guiding Post-Polypectomy Surveillance Intervals Using the ERCPMP-V5 Dataset.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical features of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer and real-world multi-scale correlation analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Serum homocysteine-based traffic light triage colonoscopy screening in colorectal cancer at-risk patients: A prospective cohort study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Combating Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Insight from the Trials and Cohort Studies.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Review
- Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: What we need to know in the age of screening and magnifying endoscopy techniques.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Recurrence after piecemeal hot-snare endoscopic mucosal resection of 10-20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a multicenter cohort study.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Right-Sided Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Not Associated with Conventional Risk Factors for Neoplasia.Gastroenterology insights · 2025Article
- Colorectal cancer screening.Singapore medical journal · 2025Article
- Polyp Matching in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Pioneering CCE-Colonoscopy Integration Towards an AI-Driven Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Incidence, characteristics, and predictive factors of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPost-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed after a colonoscopy in which no cancer is found.
objectiveAs PCCRC has become an important quality indicator, we determined its rates, characteristics, and index colonoscopy-related predictive factors.
methodsWe carried out a multicenter, observational, retrospective study between 2015 and 2018. Rates were calculated for PCCRC developing up to 10 years after colonoscopy. PCCRC was categorized according to the most plausible explanation using World Endoscopy Organization methodology. Our PCCRC population was compared to a control cohort without CRC matched 1:4 by sex, age, index colonoscopy date, indication, endoscopist, and hospital.
resultsOne hundred seven PCCRC and 2508 detected CRC were diagnosed among 101,524 colonoscopy (0.1%), leading to rates of 0.4%, 2.2%, 3.1%, and 4.1% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. PCCRC was in right (42.4%), left (41.4%), and transverse (16.4%) colon with 31.5% at stage I, 24.7% stage II, 32.6% stage III, and 11.2% stage IV. Twenty point three percent were classified as incomplete resection, 5.4% as unresected lesions, 48.6% as missed lesions with adequate colonoscopy, and 25.7% as missed lesions with inadequate colonoscopy. The median time from colonoscopy to PCCRC was 42 months. Previous inadequate preparation (OR 3.05, 95%CI 1.73-5.36) and piecemeal polypectomy (OR 19.89, 95%CI 8.67-45.61) were independently associated with PCCRC.
conclusionsIn our population, 4.1% of CRC cases were PCCRC. Most of these lesions were in right colon and attributable to lesions not visualized despite adequate bowel cleansing. Previous inadequate cleansing and piecemeal polypectomy were associated with PCCRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.