ArticleCancer medicine2024
Opportunistic lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in National Cancer Center of China: The first 14 years' experience.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung cancer detection in CT scans using extracted nodule features and precise multistage segmentation with deep learning based ensemble model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence and risk factors of lung nodules in a non-smoking Chinese population: a prospective study of low-dose computed tomography screening.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- LncRNA FENDRR is involved in the progression and cisplatin resistance of non-small cell lung cancer via binding to DGCR8.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2026Article
- Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening for Individuals Who Have Never Smoked: A Review of Recent Updates in Taiwan and the United States.Journal of chest surgery · 2025Review
- External Testing of a Deep Learning Model for Lung Cancer Risk from Low-Dose Chest CT.Radiology · 2025Article
- Clinical analysis of incidental discovery of pulmonary nodules with computed tomography: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- A 16-year evaluation of opportunistic lung cancer screening with low-dose CT in China: comparative findings between non-smokers and smokers.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Screening for lung cancer using thin-slice low-dose computed tomography in southwestern China: a population-based real-world study.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Assessing the efficiency of eligibility criteria for low-dose computed tomography lung screening in China according to current guidelines.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Opportunistic lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in National Cancer Center of China: The first 14 years' experience.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn China, over 50% of lung cancer cases occur in nonsmokers. Thus, identifying high-risk individuals for targeted lung cancer screening is crucial. Beyond age and smoking, determining other risk factors for lung cancer in the Asian population has become a focal point of research. Using 30,000 participants in the prospectively enrolled cohort at China's National Cancer Center (NCC) over the past 14 years, we categorized participants by risk, with an emphasis on nonsmoking females. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween November 2005 and December 2019, 31,431 individuals voluntarily underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for lung cancer screening at the NCC. We recorded details like smoking history, exposure to hazards, and family history of malignant tumors. Using the 2019 NCCN criteria, participants were categorized into high-, moderate-, and low-risk groups. Additionally, we separated non-high-risk groups into female never smokers (aged over 40) exposed to second-hand smoke (SHS) and others. Any positive results from initial scans were monitored per the I-ELCAP protocol (2006), and suspected malignancies were addressed through collaborative decisions between patients and physicians. We analyzed and compared the detection rates of positive results, confirmed lung cancers, and cancer stages across risk, age, and gender groups.
resultsOut of 31,431 participants (55.9% male, 44.1% female), 3695 (11.8%) showed positive baseline LDCT scans with 197 (0.6%; 106 females, 91 males) confirmed as lung cancer cases pathologically. Malignancy rate by age was 0.1% among those aged under 40 years, 0.4% among those aged 40-49 years, 0.8% among those aged 50-59 years, and 1.2% among those aged 60 years and older. From the 25,763 participants (56.9% male, 43.1% female) who completed questionnaires, 1877 (7.3%) were categorized as high risk, 6500 (25.2%) as moderate risk, and 17,386 (67.5%) as low risk. Of the 23,886 in the non-high-risk category, 8041 (33.7%) were females over 40 years old exposed to SHS. The high-risk group showed the highest lung cancer detection rate at 1.4%. However, females exposed to SHS had a notably higher detection rate than the rest of the non-high-risk group (1.1% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.0001). In this cohort, 84.8% of the detected lung cancers were at an early stage.
conclusionsIn our study, using LDCT for lung cancer screening proved significant for high-risk individuals. For non-high-risk populations, LDCT screening could be considered for nonsmoking women with exposure to SHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.