ArticleCancer medicine2024
Machine learning-based model constructed from ultrasound radiomics and clinical features for predicting HER2 status in breast cancer patients with indeterminate (2+) immunohistochemical results.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel deep learning-based prediction of HER2 expression in breast cancer using multimodal MRI, nomogram, and decision curve analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- DLCNBC-SA: a model for assessing axillary lymph node metastasis status in early breast cancer patients.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based model constructed from ultrasound radiomics and clinical features for predicting HER2 status in breast cancer patients with indeterminate (2+) immunohistochemical results.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Ultrasound Radiomics for the Prediction of Breast Cancers with HER2-Zero, -Low, and -Positive Status: A Dual-Center Study.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to predict human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) 2+ status in patients with breast cancer by constructing and validating machine learning models utilizing ultrasound (US) radiomics and clinical features.
methodsWe analyzed 203 breast cancer cases immunohistochemically determined as HER2 2+ and used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as the confirmation method. From each case, the study analyzed 840 extracted radiomics features and 11 clinicopathologic features. Cases were randomly split into training (n = 141) and validation sets (n = 62) at a 7:3 ratio. Univariate logistic regression analysis was first performed on the 11 clinicopathologic characteristics. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and decision tree (DT) techniques were employed for post-feature selection. Finally, 19 radiomics features were utilized in logistic regression (LR) and Naive Bayesian (NB) classifiers. Model performance was gauged using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsOur models exhibited notable diagnostic efficacy in differentiating HER2-positive from negative breast cancer cases. In the validation sets, the LR model outperformed the NB model with an AUC of 0.860 and accuracy of 83.8% compared to NB's AUC of 0.684 and accuracy of 79.0%. The LR model demonstrated higher sensitivity (92.3% vs. 46.2%) while the NB model had a better specificity (91.8% vs. 63.3%) in the validation set.
conclusionsMachine learning models grounded on radiomics efficiently predicted IHC HER2 2+ status in breast cancer patients, suggesting potential enhancements in clinical decision-making for treatment and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.